Re: recursively defined sets

David wrote :

On Fri, 09 May 2008 16:18:41 +0300, Phil Carmody
<thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, 08 May 2008 14:14:35 EDT, amy666
<tommy1729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

david wrote :

On Wed, 07 May 2008 17:10:30 EDT, amy666
<tommy1729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

many integer sets have been defined
recursively.

I suppose.

most notably the prime numbers.

What?

PRIME NUMBERS !
PRIMES !

Um, I knew that primes meant PRIMES. I was
wondering
about the "recursively".

Throw ``recursively enumerable sets'' into your
favourite search engine.

Why?


Phil

thanks for defending me Phil , but as you can see David and Denis are hopeless.


David C. Ullrich
.

Relevant Pages