Re: factorial sequence proposal
- From: "wugi" <brol@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 11:00:03 +0200
"I.N. Galidakis" :
wugi wrote:
The basic idea is, implementing factorials of factorials, or "powered"
factorials.
So I came to use the notation !, !!, !!!, .... !^k, although I found
out that !! is being used for less exciting (in my view) definitions.
A sequence needs a starting number, or seed n : hence,
Seq = Seq(n), with terms a(k)=Seq(n,k) as follows:
a(0) = n
a(1) = n!
a(2) = a(1)! = (n!)! == n!!
.....
a(k) = a(k-1)! = n(!!...!!) == n(!^k)
The idea is not really new. People have worked with iterated factorialsbefore.
I
For example:
http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/math/hfseries.html
There is a reference given to me by Dave L. Renfro in AMM Problems (which
can't find right now) which gives bounds for it. Using your notation (andif
memory serves right):didn't make
n^^k < n(!^k) < n^^(k+1),
where ^^ is the tetration operator. Perhaps that's why your sequence
it to OEIS.
Thank you.
But didn't OEIS aspire comprehensiveness? So if one signals not having found
such or so a series in their site, one likes at least to be pointed to it,
or any other reply. The application procedure also does (apparently) only
take specific number examples; parametered formulas seem out of question,
ruling out god knows how many cases.
A by-observation for the series above:
2 is apparently a unit seed (besides 1), as we get
2=2!=2!!=2!!!=....
guido
http://home.scarlet.be/~pin12499
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: factorial sequence proposal
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: factorial sequence proposal
- References:
- factorial sequence proposal
- From: wugi
- Re: factorial sequence proposal
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- factorial sequence proposal
- Prev by Date: Re: E = m c^2 and Riccati
- Next by Date: girls young, girlsgirlsgirls, go hold hold let never, go hold let never, goatlist xxx, going down young joc, going off zoloft, gold mining techniques, golf head covers, good ol' boys
- Previous by thread: Re: factorial sequence proposal
- Next by thread: Re: factorial sequence proposal
- Index(es):