Re: yeah sure !!!

Tonico wrote:
On May 22, 11:28 pm, lwal...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
[snip]

Well, here are some links, then.

Ioannis Galidakis, who has already posted earlier in this thread,
has two papers on tetration:

http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/math/papers/Extensions.pdf
http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/math/papers/SeriesPaper.pdf

Andrew Robbins has a paper at this
link:http://tetration.itgo.com/paper.html

Konstantin Rubtsov also has a paper on
tetration:http://www.rotarysaluzzo.it/filePDF/Iperoperazioni%20(1).pdf

Notice that as soon as one has defined tetration, the
semiexponential is trivial to define. We would have:

semiexp(x) = e^^(superlog(x)+1/2),

which is tommy1729's definition of "inverse iteration,"
except with 1/2 instead of 1.

Also, I appreciate your clarification concerning
tetration and crankhood.

*************************************************************

Thanx for the links. It all looks pretty weird, and at least from
first sight, rather unconvincing.

Hehe. This reminds me of the Mozart-Emperor incident in the movie Amadeus:

Mozart asks the Austrian Emperor whether he liked his opera and the Emperor
responds:

"It's ok, but I think it just has... too many notes...!"

and then Mozart says:

"Which notes do you have in mind for me to cut out?"

[snip]

Regards
Tonio
----
I.N. Galidakis

GIF image

Relevant Pages