sci.math

• Date Index

---

• How low can you jackasses get. I have a physics PhD. Get over it, rwill9955b
• Mysterious calculation error 17^13 + 1 - 17^13 = 0, Adem24
  • Re: Mysterious calculation error 17^13 + 1 - 17^13 = 0, Mensanator
• Re: JSH: Measuring newsgroup impact, T.H. Ray
• Primes will always exist between X and 2X, George Hayes
  • Re: Primes will always exist between X and 2X, Tonico
  • Re: Primes will always exist between X and 2X, David C. Ullrich
• Indiscrete Thoughts, by Gian-Carlo Rota, Marko Amnell
• Sylvester, KY
• Re: Measuring newsgroup impact, Jesse F. Hughes
• even number, sophia
  • Re: even number, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: even number, sophia
  • Re: even number, amzoti
  • Re: even number, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: even number, Gene Wagenbreth
    • Re: even number, bill
• A question to number theorists: Does exist any direct proof that some number lesser than 1 is irrational?, kunzmilan
  • Re: A question to number theorists: Does exist any direct proof that some number lesser than 1 is irrational?, gerry
    • Re: A question to number theorists: Does exist any direct proof that some number lesser than 1 is irrational?, karl
  • Re: A question to number theorists: Does exist any direct proof that some number lesser than 1 is irrational?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Geometry with radius.., mina_world
  • Re: Geometry with radius.., David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Geometry with radius.., mina_world
  • Re: Geometry with radius.., Narasimham
    • Re: Geometry with radius.., Philippe 92
      • Re: Geometry with radius.., Narasimham
      • Re: Geometry with radius.., Philippe 92
      • Re: Geometry with radius.., Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Geometry with radius.., Jutta Gut
• Re: -- Tetration: x - f(x) + f(f(x)) - f(f(f(x))) + ... - ... = 1/2*(exp(x) - 1) ??, alainverghote
  • Re: -- Tetration: x - f(x) + f(f(x)) - f(f(f(x))) + ... - ... = 1/2*(exp(x) - 1) ??, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: -- Tetration: x - f(x) + f(f(x)) - f(f(f(x))) + ... - ... = 1/2*(exp(x) - 1) ??, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: -- Tetration: x - f(x) + f(f(x)) - f(f(f(x))) + ... - ... = 1/2*(exp(x) - 1) ??, alainverghote
• New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 30, 2008, PhDs . org
• Uniform Continuity, Joubert
• -- Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you. [15], Ken Pledger
• Basti Newsgroup: computer science (public), Mehran Basti
• Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, Yihong
  • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, Yihong
      • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, Yihong
    • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, William Elliot
      • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Can image of a continuous function be a perfect set?, Dave L. Renfro
• AF1 x jordan 4 5 7 8 6 20 1 12 23 fusion shoes ugg boots, WWW.THENIKESHOES.NET
• Bouguer-Lambert law of absorption, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Bouguer-Lambert law of absorption, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Bouguer-Lambert law of absorption, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Bouguer-Lambert law of absorption, Ray Johnstone
    • Re: Bouguer-Lambert law of absorption, Angus Rodgers
• Envelope of catenaries, Narasimham
  • Re: Envelope of catenaries, Robert Israel
    • Re: Envelope of catenaries, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Envelope of catenaries, Narasimham
• Compact objects in derived categories, vinx . beck
  • Re: Compact objects in derived categories, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Compact objects in derived categories, vinx . beck
      • Re: Compact objects in derived categories, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• Training spatial visualization: trip-lets 3D game, humberto . bortolossi
• Orientation of a compact manifold, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Orientation of a compact manifold, sanchopancho80
• Discrete math with increasing function., mina_world
• Homotopy, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Homotopy, Philippe Gaucher
• Algebra with sqrt(-19)..., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with sqrt(-19)..., Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
    • Re: Algebra with sqrt(-19)..., Arturo Magidin
• ifft, zingas
  • Re: ifft, John O'Flaherty
• proof of chain rule, conrad
  • Re: proof of chain rule, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: proof of chain rule, William Elliot
    • Re: proof of chain rule, William Elliot
  • Re: proof of chain rule, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: proof of chain rule, conrad
      • Re: proof of chain rule, Ted Hwa
      • Re: proof of chain rule, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: proof of chain rule, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: proof of chain rule, David C. Ullrich
• f(X), KY
  • Re: f(X), Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: f(X), Robert Israel
      • Re: f(X), alainverghote
    • Re: f(X), Robert Israel
  • Re: f(X), KY
  • Re: f(X), KY
• Simple Optimization Question, junoexpress
  • Re: Simple Optimization Question, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Simple Optimization Question, junoexpress
      • Re: Simple Optimization Question, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Simple Optimization Question, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Simple Optimization Question, junoexpress
• Non-recursively enumerable set with non-recursive enumerable complement, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Non-recursively enumerable set with non-recursive enumerable complement, galathaea
    • Re: Non-recursively enumerable set with non-recursive enumerable complement, galathaea
  • Re: Non-recursively enumerable set with non-recursive enumerable complement, no comment
• cyclotomic field is galois, charles . cadogan
  • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, charles . cadogan
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, Tonico
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, charles . cadogan
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, charles . cadogan
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, Tonico
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, charles . cadogan
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: cyclotomic field is galois, charles . cadogan
• Listening to the mandelbrot., mike3
  • Re: Listening to the mandelbrot., mike3
• Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Red Star
  • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, beeworks
    • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Red Star
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Red Star
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Joshua Cranmer
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Red Star
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, beeworks
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Red Star
      • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Ray Vickson
  • Re: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system, Gordon
• Landau symbols, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Landau symbols, A N Niel
    • Re: Landau symbols, smn
    • Re: Landau symbols, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Landau symbols, A N Niel
• A tiny Collatz-exercise, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: A tiny Collatz-exercise, Michael Ellis
    • Re: A tiny Collatz-exercise, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: A tiny Collatz-exercise, Mensanator
• Turing machines and context sensitive languages, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Turing machines and context sensitive languages, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Turing machines and context sensitive languages, sanchopancho80
    • Re: Turing machines and context sensitive languages, Derek Holt
• what do you do if you spot an error in an article?, dan
  • Re: what do you do if you spot an error in an article?, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: what do you do if you spot an error in an article?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• 2402 Solutions manuals, BERGH
• Happy 2pi Day!, Jim Black
  • Re: Happy 2pi Day!, Linlin Yan
• Exciting new maths book, edzaizvobwo
• louis vuitton dsquared hogan dunk puma trainers, WWW.THENIKESHOES.NET
• -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
  • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), David W . Cantrell
    • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), Virgil
    • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
      • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
      • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
  • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), Narasimham
  • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), amy666
    • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
      • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
      • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), galathaea
    • Re: -- Solutions to sinh(z) = +/- sin(z), Denis Feldmann
• Re: PrimeLCG, dan73
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PrimeLCG, dan73
• Lemma on continuity, Bingo Bongo
  • Re: Lemma on continuity, fishfry
    • Re: Lemma on continuity, Joubert
  • Re: Lemma on continuity, Joubert
• When is a digraph..., contrapositive
  • Re: When is a digraph..., Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: When is a digraph..., contrapositive
  • Re: When is a digraph..., Ray Vickson
    • Re: When is a digraph..., contrapositive
      • Re: When is a digraph..., Ray Vickson
  • Re: When is a digraph..., PiperAlpha167
    • Re: When is a digraph..., Ray Vickson
• On Guidelines, Mehran Basti
• Probability Question, Math1723
  • Re: Probability Question, Jonathan Hoyle
• Articles on Mathematics, Mehran Basti
• Looking for two math-ish things, Bart Goddard
  • Re: Looking for two math-ish things, gerry
    • Re: Looking for two math-ish things, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Looking for two math-ish things, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Looking for two math-ish things, Robert Israel
• Godel's Incompleteness theorem, moorthy
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Neilist
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Neilist
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, LauLuna
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Gc
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, amzoti
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, moorthy
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, MoeBlee
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Kyle T. Jones
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Tonico
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, A N Niel
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, T.H. Ray
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Message not available
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Message not available
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Herman Jurjus
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Rainer Rosenthal
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, LauLuna
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Peter_Smith
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, BURT
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, moorthy
      • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Scott H
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, LauLuna
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem, PiperAlpha167
• Limit point, open, closed, Christian
  • Re: Limit point, open, closed, Rainer Rosenthal
    • Re: Limit point, open, closed, mina_world
      • Re: Limit point, open, closed, William Elliot
• IIT JEE Previous Years Solved Papers By Different Authors, rahuldulani
• Number with expression., mina_world
  • Re: Number with expression., The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Number with expression., mina_world
• Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, danix800@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, danix800@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, gerry
    • Re: Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, Derek Holt
      • Re: Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Rubik's Cube group with maximum order 1980?, Derek Holt
• I TELL YOU THE 8-TH WONDERES OF THE WORLD . YOU JUST CLICK AND JOIN HERE. YOU SEE WHAT WILL HAPPAN IN YOUR LIFE. WWW.ONLINESECRETS1000.BLOGSPOT.COM, yuva
• Number with fermat prime 2^(2^n) + 1, mina_world
  • Re: Number with fermat prime 2^(2^n) + 1, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Number with fermat prime 2^(2^n) + 1, Roman B. Binder
    • Re: Number with fermat prime 2^(2^n) + 1, Larry Hammick
• chanel dior prada d&g sunglasses sneakers, WWW.THENIKESHOES.NET
• formula for nth power of 3x3 matrix?? (akin to this one for 2x2?), hanrahan398
  • Re: formula for nth power of 3x3 matrix?? (akin to this one for 2x2?), Robert Israel
• Re: Einstein: Jewish Liar, Conman and Plagerist, T.H. Ray
• Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mehran Basti
  • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
  • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, amzoti
  • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, William Elliot
    • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Philippe 92
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, William Elliot
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Michael Press
      • Re: [OT] Char encoding. was: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Philippe 92
    • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, William Elliot
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Lits O'Hate
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, I.N. Galidakis
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, I.N. Galidakis
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Mensanator
      • Re: Advantages of directive newsgroups, Michael Ellis
• exotic spheres, Riemannian manifolds, David Bernier
  • Re: exotic spheres, Riemannian manifolds, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: exotic spheres, Riemannian manifolds, John Milnor, JEMebius
• Spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix, mhasoba
• Games Behind that accounts for ties, Zamdrist
  • Re: Games Behind that accounts for ties, Robert Israel
    • Re: Games Behind that accounts for ties, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Games Behind that accounts for ties, Mensanator
• extrapolation based on slope, BlueJ774
  • Re: extrapolation based on slope-, JEMebius
• Re: SOLUTIONS MANUALS GETSOLUTION TEAM, Solutionbooks
• i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Alan B Fabian
  • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Joshua Cranmer
  • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, N. Silver
    • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Robert Israel
  • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, David Bernier
    • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, David Bernier
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, David Bernier
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, David Bernier
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, David Bernier
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, I.N. Galidakis
      • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B Fabian, Bob F
    • Re: i am looking for a couple ALMOST impossible math problems-Alan B, Greg Calvino
• Re: Graham's number, Skylark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Graham's number, Skylark
• polynomial form for gamma function matrics, bobowm@xxxxxxxxx
• Limit, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Limit, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Limit, amzoti
  • Re: Limit, victor_meldrew_666
    • Re: Limit, A N Niel
      • Re: Limit, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Limit, victor_meldrew_666
      • Re: Limit, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Limit, Virgil
      • Re: Limit, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Limit, Alois Steindl
  • Re: Limit, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Limit, James Burns
  • Re: Limit, The World Wide Wade
• Looking for a Matrix recipe, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Looking for a Matrix recipe, Robert Israel
    • Re: Looking for a Matrix recipe, Hauke Reddmann
    • Re: Looking for a Matrix recipe, Robert Israel
      • Re: Looking for a Matrix recipe, Robert Israel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Looking for a Matrix recipe, Hauke Reddmann
• Topology with boundary f^-1(B), mina_world
  • Re: Topology with boundary f^-1(B), mina_world
    • Re: Topology with boundary f^-1(B), William Elliot
• how to do maths and science, pallavi
• Murphy for Matrices, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Murphy for Matrices, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Murphy for Matrices, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Murphy for Matrices, Fatal
      • Re: Murphy for Matrices, Derek Holt
      • Re: Murphy for Matrices, Toni Lassila
• Primes of the form n!+1, Saysero
  • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Saysero
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Saysero
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Robert Israel
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Pink Pig
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, mike3
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Saysero
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, gaew
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, mjc
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form n!+1, Phil Carmody
• Orientable mainfold, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Orientable mainfold, Fatal
• cubic spline question, BlueJ774
  • Re: cubic spline question, BlueJ774
    • Re: cubic spline question, Ian Parker
    • Re: cubic spline question, toni . lassila
      • Re: cubic spline question, BlueJ774
      • Re: cubic spline question, Ray Vickson
      • Re: cubic spline question, Ian Parker
      • Re: cubic spline question, mjc
    • Re: cubic spline question, gerry
  • Re: cubic spline question, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: cubic spline question, Rob Johnson
  • Re: cubic spline question, Pfsszxt
• "You Now Have The Chance To Make Thousands A Week Using The Most Well Kept Money Making Secrets", yuva
• GGG LRG antik coogi shmack ed hardy red monkey jeans, WWW.THENIKESHOES.NET
• Solutions Manuals & Test banks AVAILABLE - Accounting, Finance, Taxation, 7sirius7
• How to expand (x+y)^i where i is fractional, poboxabcde
  • Re: How to expand (x+y)^i where i is fractional, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: How to expand (x+y)^i where i is fractional, I.N. Galidakis
    • Re: How to expand (x+y)^i where i is fractional, Virgil
  • Re: How to expand (x+y)^i where i is fractional, alainverghote
• Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites), Mehran Basti
  • Re: Not welcome to sci.math, Joshua Cranmer
  • Re: Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites), Jamie
  • Re: Welcome to Basti Newsgroups (sites), Frederick Williams
• Matrix annotation?, onofftopic
  • Re: Matrix annotation?-, JEMebius
  • Re: Matrix annotation?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Matrix annotation?, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Matrix annotation?, pApAk
      • Re: Matrix annotation?, David C. Ullrich
• Diagonal and isotropic covariance matrix?, saneman
• Math Webtools, vanovsky
  • Re: Math Webtools, amzoti
    • Re: Math Webtools, vanovsky
      • Re: Math Webtools, amzoti
  • Re: Math Webtools, Mensanator
• Generalized ULAM Computer Results, Charlie-Boo
• Basti Newsgroup (Math or Physics), Mehran Basti
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup (Math or Physics), amzoti
  • Basti reported as a spammer, everyone should do likewise to BAN BASTI !, Neilist
    • Re: Basti reported as a spammer, everyone should do likewise to BAN BASTI !, Mensanator
      • Re: Basti reported as a spammer, everyone should do likewise to BAN BASTI !, Mensanator
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup (Math or Physics), Han de Bruijn
• Farey sequence lattice points, Terry
  • Re: Farey sequence lattice points, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Farey sequence lattice points, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Farey sequence lattice points, gerry
      • Re: Farey sequence lattice points, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Farey sequence lattice points, Bill Dubuque
• Has anyone shown this before related to primes, George Hayes
  • Re: Has anyone shown this before related to primes, Charlie-Boo
    • Re: Has anyone shown this before related to primes, George Hayes
  • Re: Has anyone shown this before related to primes, Gerry Myerson
• Automorphisms of C_{p^a}xC_{p^b}, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Automorphisms of C_{p^a}xC_{p^b}, Jack Schmidt
  • Message not available
    • Re: Automorphisms of C_{p^a}xC_{p^b}, Angus Rodgers
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Automorphisms of C_{p^a}xC_{p^b}, Angus Rodgers
• nike air jordan 1-23 shoes,lacoste puma trainers,ugg boots, www.overinstock.com
• Mandelbrot × Tricorn fractal = ???, Eric Baird
• Re: MinMax Technology, Jesse F. Hughes
• can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, hoey
  • Re: can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, Tonico
  • Re: can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, amy666
  • Re: can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, BURT
  • Re: can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, Michael Stemper
    • Re: can you have an infinitessimally small straight line?, BURT
• Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., julio
    • Re: Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., julio
  • Re: Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., se16
  • Re: Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., Adrian Duma
  • Re: Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Analysis with lim a_n /sqrt(n)., Rob Johnson
• Somewhat obscure esteem, Bingo Bongo
  • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Joubert
  • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Joubert
      • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Joubert
  • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Joubert
      • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Joubert
      • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Joubert
      • Re: Somewhat obscure esteem, Angus Rodgers
• Re: group = groupoid with one element ?, Martin Wanvik
• Another sequence, julio
• number 666, the number of beast, aarklon
  • Re: number 666, the number of beast, amzoti
  • Re: number 666, the number of beast, Mensanator
    • Re: number 666, the number of beast, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: number 666, the number of beast, fishfry
    • Re: number 666, the number of beast, Michael Press
      • Re: number 666, the number of beast, T.H. Ray
• Please i need it, Maximon
• Re: Science without Greek?, amy666
  • Re: Science without Greek?, I.N. Galidakis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Science without Greek?, Jesse F. Hughes
• From signal constellation to sinc function in OFDM, zingas
• Goldbach's conjecture requirements for proof?, George Hayes
  • Re: Goldbach's conjecture requirements for proof?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Goldbach's conjecture requirements for proof?, George Hayes
      • Re: Goldbach's conjecture requirements for proof?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Goldbach's conjecture requirements for proof?, George Hayes
• Laplace transform as an algebraic tool, GlenNJ
• Sharply 5-Transitive: M12, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12-, JEMebius
    • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12-, PaulHjelmstad
    • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12-, Jack Schmidt
      • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12-, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12, Derek Holt
    • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12, JEMebius
    • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12, David Bernier
    • Re: Sharply 5-Transitive: M12, PaulHjelmstad
• Examples of euclidean spaces, newsgr . mail
  • Re: Examples of euclidean spaces, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Examples of euclidean spaces, newsgr . mail
      • Re: Examples of euclidean spaces, Rotwang
  • Re: Examples of euclidean spaces, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: Examples of euclidean spaces, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Examples of euclidean spaces, Fatal
• mathematica and matlab, minimus
  • Re: mathematica and matlab, amzoti
    • Re: mathematica and matlab, amzoti
      • Re: mathematica and matlab, Ray Vickson
      • Re: mathematica and matlab, amzoti
  • Re: mathematica and matlab, minimus
• Smooth submanifold, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Smooth submanifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
  • Re: Smooth submanifold, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Smooth submanifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Smooth submanifold, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Smooth submanifold, simeon1111
    • Re: Smooth submanifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, simeon1111
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Smooth submanifold, victor_meldrew_666
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, David Bernier
      • Re: Smooth submanifold, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• Index set basics, kimi
  • Re: Index set basics, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Index set basics, William Elliot
  • Re: Index set basics, Dave Seaman
• Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, elsiemelsi
  • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, elsiemelsi
    • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, elsiemelsi
      • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, T.H. Ray
    • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, elsiemelsi
      • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, Jacko
  • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, T.H. Ray
  • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, scattered
    • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, Tonico
  • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, David Bernier
  • Re: Colin leslie dean a philosopher that upsets the status quo, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Mathematics ends in meaninglessness ie contradiction, elsiemelsi
• Calculating dice game odds, eval3
  • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, eval3
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, eval3
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, eval3
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, eval3
      • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
  • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Calculating dice game odds, Ray Vickson
• St. Petersburg paradox shows probability theory ends in meaninglessness, elsiemelsi
  • Re: St. Petersburg paradox shows probability theory ends in meaninglessness, kunzmilan
• Contact email for Basti Newsgroups, Mehran Basti
  • Re: Contact email for Basti Newsgroups, Jesse F. Hughes
• Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematical true thus incompleteness theorem is invalid/meaningless, elsiemelsi
  • Re: Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematical true thus incomplet, elsiemelsi
• Application for membership (Physics), Mehran Basti
  • Re: Application for membership (Physics), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Application for membership (Physics), Frederick Williams
  • Re: Application for membership (Physics), porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Basti reported as a spammer, everyone should do likewise to BAN BASTI !, Neilist
• Affine tangent map, Bingo Bongo
  • Re: Affine tangent map, smn
• Smooth manifolds, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Smooth manifolds, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Smooth manifolds, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Smooth manifolds, Marc Olschok
  • Re: Smooth manifolds, Jannick Asmus
• Re: Beal's Conjecture, Roman B. Binder
• Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
  • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Message not available
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, MoeBlee
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, David Bernier
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, MoeBlee
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Kyle Becker
      • Re: Grothendieck Universes, finite guy
  • Re: Grothendieck Universes, Denis Feldmann
• Book about Complex Function Theory, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Book about Complex Function Theory, FredJeffries
  • Re: Book about Complex Function Theory, David Moran
    • Re: Book about Complex Function Theory, The World Wide Wade
• New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 23, 2008, PhDs . org
• Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, David Sevilla
  • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, David Sevilla
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, David Sevilla
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, David Sevilla
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, OwlHoot
  • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Narasimham
  • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Narasimham
  • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Narasimham
    • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, OwlHoot
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Hagen
  • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, victor_meldrew_666
    • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Hagen
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, Roman B. Binder
      • Re: Simple proof of "y^2=x^3-x is not parametrizable"?, victor_meldrew_666
• Application for membership, Mehran Basti
  • Re: Application for membership, Tonico
    • Re: Application for membership, Neilist
      • Re: Application for membership, amzoti
      • Re: Application for membership, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Application for membership, Mehran Basti
    • Re: Application for membership, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Application for membership, Jamie
    • Re: Application for membership, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Application for membership, amzoti
  • Re: Application for membership, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
• largest prime, sophia
  • Re: largest prime, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: largest prime, pauldepstein
      • Re: largest prime, Robert Israel
    • Re: largest prime, Pubkeybreaker
• Math Undergrad Seeking Advice About Decisions in College, fatguystuckininternet
• Non-linear oscillations, Narasimham
  • Re: Non-linear oscillations-, JEMebius
    • Re: Non-linear oscillations-, Narasimham
      • Re: Non-linear oscillations--, JEMebius
• What are the odds?, dan73
  • Re: What are the odds?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: What are the odds?, dan73
    • Re: What are the odds?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Locating a shape in measured data represented by piecewise function, Edward Jensen
  • Re: Locating a shape in measured data represented by piecewise function, Narasimham
    • Re: Locating a shape in measured data represented by piecewise function, Han de Bruijn
• Hermite vs Cantor, amy666
• Re: JSH: Diminishing concerns on factoring, T.H. Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Diminishing concerns on factoring, Jesse F. Hughes
• slope vs. angle, zxcv_890
  • Re: slope vs. angle, Raphanus
    • Re: slope vs. angle, Gib Bogle
      • Re: slope vs. angle, BURT
  • Re: slope vs. angle, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: slope vs. angle, Gib Bogle
  • Re: slope vs. angle, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: slope vs. angle, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: slope vs. angle, Narasimham
• Re: What maths qualify as abstract?, T.H. Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What maths qualify as abstract?, T.H. Ray
• The value of the St. Petersburg paradox, pauldepstein
  • Re: The value of the St. Petersburg paradox, mousomer
    • Re: The value of the St. Petersburg paradox, se16
      • Re: The value of the St. Petersburg paradox, pauldepstein
• DATA ENTRY, sudhaedit
• Hardy space H^1, TCL
  • Re: Hardy space H^1, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Hardy space H^1, The World Wide Wade
• Basti Newsgroup, Basti05b
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Basti05b
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Tonico
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Joshua Cranmer
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Mensanator
    • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Tonico
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Tonico
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Tonico
    • Re: Basti Newsgroup, litsohate
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Mensanator
  • Re: Basti Newsgroup, William Eliott
    • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Tonico
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Basti Newsgroup, Mehran Basti
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, amzoti
      • Re: Basti Newsgroup, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
• p-adic metric, Saysero
  • Re: p-adic metric, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• Mirror, Saysero
  • Re: Mirror, Narasimham
    • Re: Mirror, Saysero
      • Re: Mirror, Tonico
  • Re: Mirror, Kaba
    • Re: Mirror, Virgil
  • Re: Mirror, Raphanus
  • Re: Mirror, Michael Press
    • Re: Mirror, Ray Vickson
• Re: Einstein and math, T.H. Ray
  • Re: Einstein and math, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Einstein and math, BURT
      • Re: Einstein and math, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Einstein and math, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Einstein and math, mike3
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Einstein and math, T.H. Ray
• 2200 ++ solution manuals, razorback4solution
• What has fractal theory achieved?, Harold Weissman
  • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Peter Webb
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Michael Press
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Michael Press
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Michael Press
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, amy666
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Ken
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, BURT
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, amy666
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, julio
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, julio
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, amy666
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, julio
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, julio
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, T.H. Ray
  • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, user923005
  • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: What has fractal theory achieved?, Han de Bruijn
• Pasch's axiom, Robbi
  • Re: Pasch's axiom, no comment
• Tons of solution manuals available here, razorback4solution
• Tons of solution manuals available, razorback4solution
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Tons of solution manuals available, razorback4solution
    • Re: Tons of solution manuals available, abranwz
      • Re: Tons of solution manuals available, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Tons of solution manuals available, Solutionbooks
      • Re: Tons of solution manuals available, Solutionbooks
• Re: Brilliant speech, T.H. Ray
• Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, T.H. Ray
  • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mitch . nicolas . raemsch
    • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mitch . nicolas . raemsch
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mitch . nicolas . raemsch
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mitch . nicolas . raemsch
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, BURT
      • Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve, mike3
• Gaussian distribution define in infinite-dimensional Hilbert space?, istillshine
  • Re: Gaussian distribution define in infinite-dimensional Hilbert space?, Christopher Henrich
• Gottfried Helms paper ?, amy666
• Proving a proposition on commutators., Michael Press
  • Re: Proving a proposition on commutators., Jack Schmidt
    • Re: Proving a proposition on commutators., Michael Press
• Cetera Algorithm, ghooty
• I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, rwill9955b
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Mensanator
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Neilist
    • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Quinn Tyler Jackson
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, amzoti
    • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Neilist
      • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, amzoti
      • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, fishfry
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Chip Eastham
      • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, JSH
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Pfsszxt
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, No Bull Prize
  • Re: I am fed up about the hulaboo about James Harris, Crabapple
• tetration limit, amy666
  • Re: tetration limit, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: tetration limit, amy666
    • Re: tetration limit, Walter
• Interesting puzzle, Saysero
• "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Richard Hayden
  • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Raphanus
    • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Raphanus
      • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Dominijanni Simone
      • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Dominijanni Simone
      • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: "Near to" zero eigenvectors, Jannick Asmus
• Number theory newsgroup, Saysero
  • Re: Number theory newsgroup, Bart Goddard
• Re: -- tetration: news on series of increasing heights of powertowers (tetra-series) / edit corrections, amy666
• Re: Google Search uses ADVANCED UFO/ALIEN TECHNOLOGY?, amy666
  • Re: Google Search uses ADVANCED UFO/ALIEN TECHNOLOGY?, tommy1729
• connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, Bingo Bongo
  • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, Joubert
    • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, William Elliot
      • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, William Elliot
      • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, William Elliot
      • Re: connected+locally compact -> sigma compact, José Carlos Santos
• Representation algebra semisimplicity, ronb127
  • Re: Representation algebra semisimplicity, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: Representation algebra semisimplicity, ronb127
    • Re: Representation algebra semisimplicity, Jack Schmidt
      • Re: Representation algebra semisimplicity, ronb127
      • Re: Representation algebra semisimplicity, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Representation algebra semisimplicity, ronb127
• Base of a vector space, Saysero Shyoph
  • Re: Base of a vector space, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Base of a vector space, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Base of a vector space, Saysero
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Fatal
      • Re: Base of a vector space, A N Niel
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Edward Green
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Saysero
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Virgil
      • Re: Base of a vector space, Arturo Magidin
• -- tetration: news on series of increasing heights of powertowers (tetra-series), Gottfried Helms
  • Re: -- tetration: news on series of increasing heights of powertowers (tetra-series), Gottfried Helms
• A Formula for Pi, Maury Barbato
  • Re: A Formula for Pi, Valeri Astanoff
  • Re: A Formula for Pi, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: A Formula for Pi, Maury Barbato
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Axel Vogt
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Dave Seaman
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Dave Seaman
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Axel Vogt
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Axel Vogt
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Michael Press
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Michael Press
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, James Waldby
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Michael Press
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, James Waldby
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Michael Press
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Mensanator
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A Formula for Pi, Rob Johnson
• solving for two angles..., Steve
  • Re: solving for two angles..., Gerry Myerson
  • Re: solving for two angles..., Robert Israel
• self-replicating systems, daniel tisdale
  • Re: self-replicating systems, Robert Israel
  • Re: self-replicating systems, Michael Press
    • Re: self-replicating systems, daniel tisdale
• polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, amy666
  • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, amy666
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, tommy1729
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, amy666
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, amy666
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, tommy1729
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, gerry
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, OwlHoot
      • Re: polynomial diophantines and derivatives ?, amy666
• Estimating graph size from its longest route, ivanatora
  • Re: Estimating graph size from its longest route, ivanatora
    • Re: Estimating graph size from its longest route, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Estimating graph size from its longest route, Robert Israel
• Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Chris Cappuccilli
  • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Bart Goddard
    • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Bart Goddard
      • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Bart Goddard
    • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Michael Press
  • Re: sudoku: test yourself-Chris Cappuccilli, Dan Shalloway
  • SUDOKU-OFF!- only one winner, Scott Gladstone!, Scott Gladstone
    • Re: SUDOKU-OFF!- only one winner, Scott Gladstone!, Bart Goddard
• How to find out the median of a list without sorting ?, pereges
  • Re: How to find out the median of a list without sorting ?, Chris Cappuccilli
  • Re: How to find out the median of a list without sorting ?, Rick Decker
• Topology with b(A)., mina_world
  • Re: Topology with b(A)., A N Niel
  • Re: Topology with b(A)., William Elliot
• Conjugate points, and reunions of geodesics, hrmacbeth
  • Re: Conjugate points, and reunions of geodesics, Narasimham
• Solutions manual to Elements of engineering electromagnetics (6/e) by N.N.RAO, sendsolutions
• Re: finitely many subgroups of a group, Jack Schmidt
• summing a particular series, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: summing a particular series, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: summing a particular series, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: summing a particular series, David W . Cantrell
• Generators of analytic subgroups of R, tango
  • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, Robert Israel
    • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, vinay . yadava
      • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, vinay . yadava
    • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, tango
      • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, Robert Israel
      • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Generators of analytic subgroups of R, Robert Israel
• Partial Fraction, KY
  • Re: Partial Fraction, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Re: Closed form boundary and navigation functions, pfazenda
• Question about the millennium prize problems, Bjarne
  • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, Bjarne
      • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, toni . lassila
      • Re: Question about the millennium prize problems, David Bernier
• riemann surface, jinhyun
  • Re: riemann surface, jinhyun
    • Re: riemann surface, Robert Israel
  • Re: riemann surface, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: riemann surface, jinhyun
  • Re: riemann surface, Axel Vogt
    • Re: riemann surface, jinhyun
      • Re: riemann surface, Axel Vogt
      • Re: riemann surface, jinhyun
      • Re: riemann surface, Axel Vogt
      • Re: riemann surface, jinhyun
• "Foci" of a triangle?, Bhushit Joshipura
  • Re: "Foci" of a triangle?, Philippe 92
• Probably simple math problem, filia&sofia
  • Re: Probably simple math problem, Torsten Hennig
• Terminology Question, rich burge
• Fractional iteration again (sorry), Rotwang
  • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), Rotwang
    • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), amy666
      • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), Rotwang
      • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), amy666
      • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), alainverghote
    • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), David Libert
      • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), David Libert
      • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), Rotwang
      • Re: Fractional iteration again (sorry), alainverghote
• Connected components in black & white, Gauster
  • Re: Connected components in black & white, William Elliot
  • Re: Connected components in black & white, William Elliot
• Re: Differentials and and their Inverses?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Differentials and and their Inverses?, Ray Vickson
• Point of maximum curvature (point of diminishing returns)?, jefftyzzer
  • Re: Point of maximum curvature (point of diminishing returns)?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Point of maximum curvature (point of diminishing returns)?, jefftyzzer
      • Re: Point of maximum curvature (point of diminishing returns)?, Greg Neill
      • Re: Point of maximum curvature (point of diminishing returns)?, Gerry Myerson
• invert the factoring problem, jerry5372
  • Re: invert the factoring problem, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: invert the factoring problem, jerry5372
  • Re: invert the factoring problem, Pubkeybreaker
• Domain invariance theorem, Bingo Bongo
  • Re: Domain invariance theorem, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Domain invariance theorem, Bingo Bongo
      • Re: Domain invariance theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Domain invariance theorem, Bingo Bongo
      • Re: Domain invariance theorem, Arturo Magidin
• parameter estimation problem, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: parameter estimation problem, junoexpress
    • Re: parameter estimation problem, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: parameter estimation problem, magya_bloom@xxxxxxxxx
• FLT fun, Rick Decker
  • Re: FLT fun, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: FLT fun, Tonico
  • Re: FLT fun, Jürgen R .
• welcome to www.lvfashionworld.com ,we supply Air Force 1 07 Low / Mid / High Men &Women, Supreme Original Six Players - White (Limited Supreme Edition ) shoes at the low price, lvfashionworld
• How many periodic functions are there?, Lisa Camille
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, A N Niel
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Lisa Camille
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Lisa Camille
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Lisa Camille
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?-, JEMebius
    • Re: How many periodic functions are there?-, scattered
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?-, mike3
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Narasimham
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Dan Shalloway
  • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Narasimham
    • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, mjc
      • Re: How many periodic functions are there?, Narasimham
• improper integral......, John
  • Re: improper integral......, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: improper integral......, Ray Vickson
    • Re: improper integral......, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: improper integral......, Ray Vickson
  • Re: improper integral......, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: improper integral......, Gib Bogle
      • Re: improper integral......, Dave Seaman
      • Re: improper integral......, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: improper integral......, geo
• Looking for information on finite rings, Herbert
  • Re: Looking for information on finite rings, Larry Hammick
  • Re: Looking for information on finite rings, Jack Schmidt
• conjectures on integrals arising from QED (quantum theory), David Bernier
• Re: SOLUTIONS MANUAL 6/2008, grnagendran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SOLUTIONS MANUAL 6/2008, park . hanup
    • Re: SOLUTIONS MANUAL 6/2008, Solutionbooks
• Solutions manual, johnjay_barrow3160
  • Re: Solutions manual, Ivar Rosquist
• Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, Adam Burley
  • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, cbrown
      • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
  • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups isomorphic?, Derek Holt
    • Re: Does having same numbers of elements of each order make groups, Adam Burley
• [Discrete Maths] Generating Functions / Recurrence Relations, Rafael Almeida
  • Re: [Discrete Maths] Generating Functions / Recurrence Relations, Michael Press
• Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, paston . cooper
  • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, paston . cooper
      • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, Rob Johnson
    • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, paston . cooper
    • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, paston . cooper
      • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Maximum number of regions bounded by n lines on a plane, paston . cooper
• Cyclotomic cosets, bearophileHUGS
  • Re: Cyclotomic cosets, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Cyclotomic cosets, bearophileHUGS
• Re: the most stupid thing david ever said., mike3
  • Re: the most stupid thing david ever said., amy666
• Time. /My opinion./, socratus
  • Re: Time. /My opinion./, SO1OS
    • Re: Time. /My opinion./, socratus
      • Re: Time. /My opinion./, socratus
      • Re: Time. /My opinion./, socratus
• non-negative minimum, Carl R.
  • Re: non-negative minimum, Horand . Gassmann
  • Re: non-negative minimum, I.N. Galidakis
  • Re: non-negative minimum, Axel Vogt
  • Re: non-negative minimum, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: non-negative minimum, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: non-negative minimum, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: non-negative minimum, William Elliot
• Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Toni Lassila
  • Message not available
    • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Muhammad
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Muhammad
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Gerry Myerson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Toni Lassila
      • Mathematical notation customs (was Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921), Gerry Myerson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, David C . Ullrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, David C . Ullrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Refute an alleged proof of the Riemann Hypothesis was Re: Refute a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, round #4921, David C . Ullrich
• Complex analysis/ integral curve question, Rotwang
  • Re: Complex analysis/ integral curve question, Robert Israel
    • Re: Complex analysis/ integral curve question, Rotwang
      • Re: Complex analysis/ integral curve question, Robert Israel
      • Re: Complex analysis/ integral curve question, Rotwang
• Discount WaTcHeS,sunglasses,Smet T-shirts, COOGI T-shirts, POLO T-shirts, LRG Jeans, EDhardy Jeans, Evisu Jeans, etc, yongjunxu . trading
• Irrational Numbers., bleedingvein
  • Re: Irrational Numbers., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Irrational Numbers., Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: Irrational Numbers., Jussi Piitulainen
    • Re: Irrational Numbers., Bill Dubuque
  • Re: Irrational Numbers., Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Irrational Numbers., Frederick Williams
• infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), amy666
  • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), David C . Ullrich
    • actual vs potential infinity : definition ?, amy666
      • Re: actual vs potential infinity : definition ?, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: actual vs potential infinity : definition ?, amy666
      • Re: actual vs potential infinity : definition ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: actual vs potential infinity : definition ?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), Edward Green
      • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), Edward Green
      • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ) (2), Edward Green
• Perfect symmetry and asymmetry in statistical distributions, Paul Smith
  • Re: Perfect symmetry and asymmetry in statistical distributions, Alois Steindl
    • Re: Perfect symmetry and asymmetry in statistical distributions, Paul Smith
  • Re: Perfect symmetry and asymmetry in statistical distributions, Ray Vickson
• Wythoff's series and golden ratio, salonowiec
  • Re: Wythoff's series and golden ratio, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Wythoff's series and golden ratio, salonowiec
      • Re: Wythoff's series and golden ratio, Leon Aigret
      • Re: Wythoff's series and golden ratio, julio
• Help me the lyrics of this math song~~~~, ChineseBoy who loves maths
  • Re: Help me the lyrics of this math song~~~~, Edward Green
    • Re: Help me the lyrics of this math song~~~~, Edward Green
    • Re: Help me the lyrics of this math song~~~~, Edward Green
• Make Money - Not a scam, Chris Kelln
  • Re: Make Money - Not a scam, Peter Webb
    • Re: Make Money - Not a scam, Pfsszxt
• Re: hahaha semi exponential , tetration, mike3
  • Re: hahaha semi exponential , tetration, Denis Feldmann
    • another flawed logic by denis, amy666
      • Re: another flawed logic by denis, Tonico
      • Re: another flawed logic by denis, Denis Feldmann
      • sorry denis , i read to fast, amy666
      • Re: another flawed logic by denis, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: hahaha semi exponential , tetration, mike3
  • Re: hahaha semi exponential , tetration, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: hahaha semi exponential , tetration, mike3
• solution manual, All solutions team
• Free Advertise Your opportunity To 1,000,000 people, tduregold
• Re: 4=3 A maths joke, Albert
• Re-writing a variable to the power of a fraction, Albert
  • Re: Re-writing a variable to the power of a fraction, amorrisonca1@xxxxxxxx
    • Re: Re-writing a variable to the power of a fraction, Albert
      • Re: Re-writing a variable to the power of a fraction, Tonico
  • Re: Re-writing a variable to the power of a fraction, Ray Vickson
  • Message not available
    • Re: Re-writing a variable to the power of a fraction, Angus Rodgers
• analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, Carl R.
  • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, Rupert
    • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, Virgil
      • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, William Elliot
      • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, Torsten Hennig
      • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, William Elliot
      • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, Rob Johnson
      • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, William Elliot
  • Re: analysis problem, intermediate value theorem, riderofgiraffes
• Re: Overcome FLT by a new method, Phuong
  • Re: Overcome FLT by a new method, Tommy1729
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Overcome FLT by a new method, Phuong
  • Re: Overcome FLT by a new method, pauldepstein
• Intellectual Challenge: Manure an Anti-Gravity Energy mode....., Zim Olson
• Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, gk712
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, JohnF
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Mensanator
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Richard Henry
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Michael Press
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Joshua Cranmer
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Peter Webb
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Daniel da Silva
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Mensanator
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Daniel da Silva
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Jaap Spies
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Toni Lassila
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Peter Webb
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, scattered
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, scattered
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, scattered
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Alan Crowe
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, David Bernier
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, scattered
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Michael Press
    • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Richard Henry
      • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Michael Press
  • Re: Which computer language program is best for undergrads?, Frederick Williams
• infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ), amy666
  • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ), David C . Ullrich
    • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ), amy666
      • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ), mike3
      • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ), David C . Ullrich
  • Re: infinity , C , C * , C** , tetration and iterations ( by tommy1729 ), mike3
    • reply to mike and david, amy666
      • Re: reply to mike and david, David C. Ullrich
• Where I may see the impact factors of different math journals?, leox
  • Re: Where I may see the impact factors of different math journals?, amzoti
  • Re: Where I may see the impact factors of different math journals?, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Where I may see the impact factors of different math journals?, Gerry Myerson
• Re: injective/surjective; cardinalities, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: injective/surjective; cardinalities, Rupert
• Divisible by 7., Saysero
  • Re: Divisible by 7., Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Divisible by 7., Rob Johnson
  • Re: Divisible by 7., Terry
    • Re: Divisible by 7., Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Divisible by 7., Michael Press
• problem solution, baqar . notorious
• Correlation between adjacent data points but not the entire sample?, kyle.m.douglass@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Correlation between adjacent data points but not the entire sample?, Gerry Myerson
• GetSolutions Team For Solutions manual, GetSolution Team
• Ryhmän sfnet.keskustelu.kielipolitiikka virallinen kuvaus, Matti Kauppinen
• Question related to complex roots of 1, polymedes
  • Re: Question related to complex roots of 1, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Question related to complex roots of 1, polymedes
• Associativity of the semidirect product, Adam Burley
  • Re: Associativity of the semidirect product, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Associativity of the semidirect product, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Associativity of the semidirect product, Adam Burley
• Re: geometry problem (triangle), Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: geometry problem (triangle), Angus Rodgers
  • Re: geometry problem (triangle), bill
    • Re: geometry problem (triangle), Gerry Myerson
      • Re: geometry problem (triangle), bill
• Collatz Conjecture proof?, Mensanator
  • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, Mensanator
    • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, dattasrijit
    • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, dattasrijit
      • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, Mensanator
      • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, Srijit
      • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, Mensanator
      • Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?, Srijit
• possible solution of the Quasi's problem on two-to-one functions, Sergey P
• integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, tamiry
  • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Robert Israel
  • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Rob Johnson
  • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Michael Press
    • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Robert Israel
      • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Michael Press
      • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Michael Press
      • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: integrating (sin(x)/x)^2, Michael Press
• Product function Newton Iterator, Narasimham
  • Re: Product function Newton Iterator, Robert Israel
    • Re: Product function Newton Iterator, Narasimham
      • Re: Product function Newton Iterator, Robert Israel
• Function transformation, Ego Zim
  • Re: Function transformation, A N Niel
  • Re: Function transformation, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Function transformation, Ego Zim
      • Re: Function transformation, Ego Zim
      • Re: Function transformation, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Function transformation, Ego Zim
      • Re: Function transformation, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Function transformation, Arturo Magidin
• cheap wholesale jeans, jeans monkey red wholesale, wholesale designer jeans, wholesale evisu jeans, wholesale authentic seven jeans, wholesale discount china man jeans, wholesale true religion jeans, creditbiz38
• cheap wholesale clh hoodies streetwear, hoodies stussy, skate hoodies, discount cheap bape cheap hoodies jacket, clothing design hoodies skull, bape hoodies kid, creditbiz38
• Any ideas on complex analyical extesion of this ringfield?, Jacko
• Re: Relative primes., gerry
• n^2+n+41, tpiezas
• An uncountable proper subgroup of R, tango
  • Re: An uncountable proper subgroup of R, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: An uncountable proper subgroup of R, tango
      • Re: An uncountable proper subgroup of R, G. A. Edgar
• Algebra with algebraically closed field, characteristic., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with algebraically closed field, characteristic., José Carlos Santos
• possible solution of the problem (using Chernavsky's result), Sergey P
• New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 16, 2008, PhDs . org
• (sin(x))^n,(cos(x))^n?, pApAk
  • Re: (sin(x))^n,(cos(x))^n?, Peter Webb
    • Re: (sin(x))^n,(cos(x))^n?, pApAk
      • Re: (sin(x))^n,(cos(x))^n?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: (sin(x))^n,(cos(x))^n?, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: (sin(x))^n,(cos(x))^n?, Han de Bruijn
• Re: Ideals in tensor products of algebras, Jannick Asmus
• Algebra with simple extension field.., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with simple extension field.., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Algebra with simple extension field.., mina_world
      • Re: Algebra with simple extension field.., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Algebra with simple extension field.., Michael Press
  • Re: Algebra with simple extension field.., mina_world
• Apology From S.L._Calc, S.L._Calc
  • Re: Apology From S.L._Calc, SO1OS
    • Re: Apology From S.L._Calc, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Apology From S.L._Calc, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Apology From S.L._Calc, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Apology From S.L._Calc, S.L._Calc
    • Re: Apology From S.L._Calc, fishfry
• Homogeneous Diff Eqn, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
  • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, William Elliot
    • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
    • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, S.L._Calc
  • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
      • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
  • Re: Homogeneous Diff Eqn, Ray Vickson
• -- Numerical problem, nhlongo
  • Re: -- Numerical problem, William Elliot
    • Re: -- Numerical problem, nhlongo
      • Re: -- Numerical problem, William Elliot
      • Re: -- Numerical problem, nhlongo
      • Re: -- Numerical problem, William Elliot
      • Re: -- Numerical problem, William Elliot
      • Re: -- Numerical problem, William Elliot
• Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., Peter Webb
      • Re: Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., Peter Webb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Having problems solving a 3D transformation matrix equation., jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx
• Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Edward Green
  • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Mensanator
  • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Edward Green
      • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Edward Green
      • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: Oh Basis of Bases, Very Base of Very Base, Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
• Changing positions, aarklon
  • Re: Changing positions, Mensanator
  • Re: Changing positions, Robert Israel
  • Re: Changing positions, mike3
    • Re: Changing positions, Virgil
  • Re: Changing positions, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Casio Calculator Question, S.L._Calc
  • Re: Casio Calculator Question, S.L._Calc
    • Re: Casio Calculator Question, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Casio Calculator Question, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Casio Calculator Question, S.L._Calc
    • Re: Casio Calculator Question, S.L._Calc
• Variance of Discrete Random Variables, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Variance of Discrete Random Variables, Robert Israel
    • Re: Variance of Discrete Random Variables, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Variance of Discrete Random Variables, Maury Barbato
• Convergence in Mean Square, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Convergence in Mean Square, Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Convergence in Mean Square, Robert Israel
    • Re: Convergence in Mean Square, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Convergence in Mean Square, Robert Israel
• Algebra with finite extension field and vector space., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with finite extension field and vector space., fishfry
  • Re: Algebra with finite extension field and vector space., no comment
  • Re: Algebra with finite extension field and vector space., mina_world
• Riemann Sums, Ormond
  • Re: Riemann Sums, G. A. Edgar
• Optimization of a Quasi-convex function, anil.nelakanti@xxxxxxxxx
• Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
  • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Robert Israel
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, gerry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Robert Israel
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Terry
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Number of triangles on a 2- D lattice, Bill Dubuque
• uniform convexity, sebastian.kuzdak
  • Re: uniform convexity, Adrian Duma
• cylindrical kite, sizors_1
  • Re: cylindrical kite, Ray Vickson
  • Re: cylindrical kite, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: cylindrical kite, sizors_1
• n*2^k+17, Saysero
  • Re: n*2^k+17, OwlHoot
  • Re: n*2^k+17, no comment
    • Re: n*2^k+17, Saysero
      • Re: n*2^k+17, no comment
      • Re: n*2^k+17, Saysero
      • Re: n*2^k+17, no comment
• Some questions on non-measurable sets, tango
  • Re: Some questions on non-measurable sets, tango
    • Re: Some questions on non-measurable sets, tango
      • Re: Some questions on non-measurable sets, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Some questions on non-measurable sets, Dave L. Renfro
• Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
  • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Rainer Rosenthal
    • Re: Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Ray Vickson
    • Re: Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Ray Vickson
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Philippe 92
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Butch Malahide
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Butch Malahide
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Butch Malahide
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
      • Re: Discrete math with fish..., mina_world
    • Re: Discrete math with fish..., Robert Israel
  • Re: Discrete math with fish..., fishfry
• Axiom of Foundation, tango
  • Re: Axiom of Foundation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Axiom of Foundation, tango
      • Re: Axiom of Foundation, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Axiom of Foundation, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Axiom of Foundation, finite guy
    • Re: Axiom of Foundation, finite guy
  • Re: Axiom of Foundation, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Axiom of Foundation, tango
  • Re: Axiom of Foundation, Aatu Koskensilta
• Is aleph smaller than beth?, William Elliot
  • Re: Is aleph smaller than beth?, Tim Little
    • Re: Is aleph smaller than beth?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is aleph smaller than beth?, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Is aleph smaller than beth?, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Is aleph smaller than beth?, William Elliot
  • Re: Is aleph smaller than beth?, Aatu Koskensilta
• Calculus with double integral.., mina_world
  • Re: Calculus with double integral.., Ray Vickson
    • Re: Calculus with double integral.., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Calculus with double integral.., David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Calculus with double integral.., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Calculus with double integral.., David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Calculus with double integral.., Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculus with double integral.., Vincent Vega
      • Re: Calculus with double integral.., mina_world
    • Re: Calculus with double integral.., mina_world
• Analysis with integral, lebesgue..., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with integral, lebesgue..., Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Analysis with integral, lebesgue..., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with integral, lebesgue..., David C . Ullrich
• Integral Extensions and Prime ideals, Jose Capco
• Re: subgroups of finite index, Jack Schmidt
• Re: simple nonabelian groups, Jack Schmidt
• Problem of differential equations, shweta
  • Re: Problem of differential equations, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Problem of differential equations, Timothy Murphy
• Measure theory - how to prove f is continuous?, Artur
  • Re: Measure theory - how to prove f is continuous?, smn
    • Re: Measure theory - how to prove f is continuous?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Measure theory - how to prove f is continuous?, smn
  • Re: Measure theory - how to prove f is continuous?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Measure theory - how to prove f is continuous?, G. A. Edgar
• Re: The Essential History of Special Relativity, T.H. Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Essential History of Special Relativity, T.H. Ray
• Integrator, S.L._Calc
• Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
  • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
    • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
    • Re: Calculus Question, Don Del Grande
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
      • Re: Calculus Question, S.L._Calc
  • Re: Calculus Question, Anon
  • Re: Calculus Question, SO1OS
• Re: Die Antinomie unendlicher Anzahlen, Roman B. Binder
• Help on constrained partitioning of integers, Ramasamy
  • Re: Help on constrained partitioning of integers, victor_meldrew_666
    • Re: Help on constrained partitioning of integers, Ramasamy
• What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, sherifffruitfly
  • Re: What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, Mark Hauerbach
    • Re: What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, Virgil
  • Re: What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: What's the period of (cos ax)(sin bx) ?, Denis Feldmann
• What's the good word?, Edward Green
  • Re: What's the good word?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: What's the good word?, Edward Green
      • Re: What's the good word?, Greg Neill
      • Re: What's the good word?, julio
      • Re: What's the good word?, julio
  • Re: What's the good word?, Phil Holman
  • Re: What's the good word?, julio
    • Re: What's the good word?, julio
      • Re: What's the good word?, julio
      • Re: What's the good word?, julio
      • Re: What's the good word?, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: What's the good word?, julio
      • Re: What's the good word?, Edward Green
      • Re: What's the good word?, julio
• dual construction to Kan extension?, canadan
• De un amigo - Deportivos.com, ricco
  • SPAM, Dantheman
• CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY, NIRMALA
• Matrix elements?, onofftopic
  • Re: Matrix elements?, hagman
    • Re: Matrix elements?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Matrix elements?, Angus Rodgers
• A beginner's question on permutation groups, Edward Green
  • Re: A beginner's question on permutation groups, hagman
    • Re: A beginner's question on permutation groups, Edward Green
      • Re: A beginner's question on permutation groups, Peter Webb
  • Re: A beginner's question on permutation groups-, JEMebius
• Projective transformation / projectivity, chamcha . saladin
• Estimation of individual-level lifetimes in survival analysis, Michael Haenlein
• new mathematical ring (field), Jacko
• Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Marshall
    • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, junoexpress
      • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Michael Press
      • Re: JSH: Most Recent Cycle, Gib Bogle
• Problem of differential calculus, shweta
  • Re: Problem of differential calculus, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Problem of differential calculus, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Problem of differential calculus, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Problem of differential calculus, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Problem of differential calculus, Timothy Murphy
• (x power y) = (y power x), shweta
  • Re: (x power y) = (y power x), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: (x power y) = (y power x), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: (x power y) = (y power x), Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: (x power y) = (y power x), Timothy Murphy
    • Re: (x power y) = (y power x), Chip Eastham
• ISO ref on "potentials" (probability tables), kj
  • Re: ISO ref on "potentials" (probability tables), David Bernier
    • Re: ISO ref on "potentials" (probability tables), kj
• Should-be-simple algebra question, Albert
  • Re: Should-be-simple algebra question, rossum
  • Re: Should-be-simple algebra question, Frederick Williams
  • Re: Should-be-simple algebra question, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Should-be-simple algebra question, Albert
      • Re: Should-be-simple algebra question, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Should-be-simple algebra question, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Box Complex method, gadolin
• system of nonlinear differential equations, raffa
  • Re: system of nonlinear differential equations, Ray Vickson
• Matrix Algebra question, TCL
  • Re: Matrix Algebra question, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Matrix Algebra question, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Matrix Algebra question, Derek Holt
      • Re: Matrix Algebra question, Derek Holt
      • Re: Matrix Algebra question, TCL
      • Re: Matrix Algebra question, TCL
      • Re: Matrix Algebra question, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Matrix Algebra question, Derek Holt
      • Re: Matrix Algebra question, David C . Ullrich
• log convex function, craig
  • Re: log convex function, David C . Ullrich
• Nowhere continuous functions, tango
  • Re: Nowhere continuous functions, The World Wide Wade
• Polynomials over Z., Saysero
  • Re: Polynomials over Z., Chip Eastham
    • Re: Polynomials over Z., gerry
• Maximum number of points closest to a point?, Andrew86
  • Re: Maximum number of points closest to a point?, Gene Wagenbreth
    • Re: Maximum number of points closest to a point?, Andrew86
  • Re: Maximum number of points closest to a point?, bill
  • Re: Maximum number of points closest to a point?, temptony
• Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Paul Ciszek
  • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Axel Vogt
    • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Paul Ciszek
      • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Axel Vogt
      • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Paul Ciszek
      • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Axel Vogt
  • Re: Question about matrix inversion, also polynomial coefficients, Robert Israel
• Parliament of Whores, Dexter
  • Re: Parliament of Whores, Ivar Rosquist
• Solution Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, Aguiar
• Variance Upper Bound, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Variance Upper Bound, Ray Vickson
  • Re: Variance Upper Bound, Ross
  • Re: Variance Upper Bound, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Variance Upper Bound, Maury Barbato
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Variance Upper Bound, Maury Barbato
• CIRCUITCITY BANKRUPTCY, NIRMALA
• Topology for relations, William Elliot
  • Re: Topology for relations, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Topology for relations, William Elliot
  • Re: Topology for relations, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Topology for relations, William Elliot
      • Re: Topology for relations, semiopen
• Coding Theory: Maximum Number of Codewords, Mathias Herrmann
• Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., leox
  • Re: Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., Ignacio
    • Re: Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., leox
      • Re: Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., Ignacio
      • Re: Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., leox
      • Re: Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., Ignacio
      • Re: Question about representations of Lie algebra sl(n)., leox
• Angle of Wheel - Stumped, Anon Email
  • Re: Angle of Wheel - Stumped, se16
  • Re: Angle of Wheel - Stumped, Grover Hughes
    • Re: Angle of Wheel - Stumped, Greg Neill
      • Re: Angle of Wheel - Stumped, Anon Email
      • Re: Angle of Wheel - Stumped, Grover Hughes
• JPK:n katoaminen, Ausgeräumt Einen
• Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
  • Re: Will this theory fly?, Bill
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
  • Re: Will this theory fly?, Peter Webb
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
  • Re: Will this theory fly?, John Bailey
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, Bill
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, Bill
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, mike3
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, Bill
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
  • Re: Will this theory fly?, Frederick Williams
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
  • Re: Will this theory fly?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, mike3
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, Bill
  • Re: Will this theory fly?, finite guy
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, finite guy
      • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
    • Re: Will this theory fly?, When You Need to Tell Someone
• That darned tetration again!, mike3
  • Re: That darned tetration again!, I.N. Galidakis
    • Re: That darned tetration again!, mike3
  • Re: That darned tetration again!, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: That darned tetration again!, mike3
  • Re: That darned tetration again!, lwalke3
    • Re: That darned tetration again!, mike3
      • Re: That darned tetration again!, mike3
  • Re: That darned tetration again!, mike3
• Taylor's Theorem, Jabot
  • Re: Taylor's Theorem, Ray Vickson
• X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, michigan
  • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, gerry
  • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, John O'Flaherty
  • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, Pfsszxt
  • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, bill
    • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, michigan
    • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, scattered
  • Re: X*Y=10 How can this be a deep dilemma?, mike3
• Congruence question., Saysero
  • Re: Congruence question., Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Congruence question., Tonico
  • Re: Congruence question., Rob Johnson
  • Re: Congruence question., Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Congruence question., Phil Carmody
      • Re: Congruence question., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Congruence question., Phil Carmody
      • Re: Congruence question., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Congruence question., Phil Carmody
    • Re: Congruence question., Rob Johnson
      • Re: Congruence question., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Congruence question., Tonico
      • Re: Congruence question., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Congruence question., Tonico
      • Re: Congruence question., Dave Seaman
      • Re: Congruence question., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Congruence question., Michael Press
      • Re: Congruence question., Tonico
      • Re: Congruence question., Phil Carmody
• help needed with a formula., pereges
  • Re: help needed with a formula., Ray Vickson
• Elementary Calculus, shweta
  • Re: Elementary Calculus, Ray Vickson
• Topology with continuous at a., mina_world
  • Re: Topology with continuous at a., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Topology with continuous at a., mina_world
      • Re: Topology with continuous at a., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Topology with continuous at a., William Elliot
• Group of 4 elements, glman74
  • Re: Group of 4 elements, Tonico
  • Re: Group of 4 elements, Alois Steindl
  • Re: Group of 4 elements, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Group of 4 elements, glman74
• Chains and Antichains, William Elliot
  • Re: Chains and Antichains, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Chains and Antichains, William Elliot
      • Re: Chains and Antichains, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Chains and Antichains, William Elliot
      • Re: Chains and Antichains, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Chains and Antichains, Larry Hammick
• A lot of Solutions Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format!, trustsolution@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A lot of Solutions Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format!, Solutionbooks
• Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), alainverghote
  • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), Count Dracula
    • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), alainverghote
    • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), Robert Israel
      • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), alainverghote
      • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), alainverghote
      • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), Robert Israel
      • Re: Solving f''(x) = 2*f(4*x + 3), alainverghote
• Debates over set theory?, mike3
  • Re: Debates over set theory?, Tonico
    • Re: Debates over set theory?, mike3
      • Re: Debates over set theory?, Tonico
      • Re: Debates over set theory?, mike3
      • Re: Debates over set theory?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Debates over set theory?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Debates over set theory?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: Debates over set theory?, alainverghote
      • Re: Debates over set theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Debates over set theory?, Aatu Koskensilta
• china whloesale .high quality products .lowest prices, gucci chanel
• A lemma about Mobius inversion, Larry Hammick
• Good news!, Brixy
• tensoring is not right exact?, mathreader
  • Re: tensoring is not right exact?, victor_meldrew_666
    • Re: tensoring is not right exact?, mathreader
• Re: FAQ: What to do about spam., Mensanator
• Re: ** Massive copyright violiation by the US Government **, Tommy1729
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ** Massive copyright violiation by the US Government **, amy666
    • Re: ** Massive copyright violiation by the US Government **, mike3
• Interiors, closures and empty interiors, ver 1.1, William Elliot
• Algebra with extension field, iso., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with extension field, iso., mina_world
    • Re: Algebra with extension field, iso., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Algebra with extension field, iso., mina_world
      • Re: Algebra with extension field, iso., mina_world
      • Re: Algebra with extension field, iso., mina_world
• Re: Combination (or is it a permutation) Problem, Arturo Magidin
• Interiors, closures and empty interior sets., William Elliot
  • Re: Interiors, closures and empty interior sets., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Interiors, closures and empty interior sets., David C . Ullrich
• Category Theory - Terminology ?, Terry/Padden
  • Re: Category Theory - Terminology ?, Marc Olschok
  • Re: Category Theory - Terminology ?, galathaea
• 1 = -1 math puzzle, michalchik@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, michalchik@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, mike3
  • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, Dave
    • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, michalchik@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, Ted Hwa
    • Re: 1 = -1 im sorry but your all wrong ! ... and correct :), amy666
  • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, beeworks
    • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, Dave
  • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, Tonico
  • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, mike3
  • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, T.H. Ray
    • Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle, Philippe 92
• Distributing n points in space, Adam Skrodzki
  • Re: Distributing n points in space, galathaea
  • Re: Distributing n points in space, Robert Israel
    • Re: Distributing n points in space, Ray Koopman
• Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Saysero
  • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., galathaea
    • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Saysero
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., galathaea
  • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Saysero
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Saysero
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Reduced residue system modulo n prime p., Gerry Myerson
• Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
  • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
    • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
    • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
    • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
    • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Kaba
      • Re: Least squares similarity transformation, Rob Johnson
• Ulam spiral, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Ulam spiral, Mensanator
    • Re: Ulam spiral, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Ulam spiral, Mensanator
  • Re: Ulam spiral, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Ulam spiral, mynameisrabbit
• anticommuting 2x2 quaternion unitary matrices?, Raphanus
  • Re: anticommuting 2x2 quaternion unitary matrices?, Raphanus
  • Re: anticommuting 2x2 quaternion unitary matrices?, Robert Israel
    • A better statement of the question: Re: anticommuting 2x2 quaternion unitary matrices?, Raphanus
      • Re: A better statement of the question: Re: anticommuting 2x2 quaternion unitary matrices?, Robert Israel
      • Re: A better statement of the question: Re: anticommuting 2x2 quaternion unitary matrices?, Raphanus
      • Re: A better statement of the question: Re: anticommuting 2x2, Robert Israel
      • Re: A better statement of the question: Re: anticommuting 2x2, Raphanus
• Re: ARITMETIC GAME FOR TWO PLAYERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, Mensanator
• Question about order, Halmos, agapito6314
  • Re: Question about order, Halmos, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Question about order, Halmos, agapito6314
    • Re: Question about order, Halmos, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about order, Halmos, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about order, Halmos, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about order, Halmos, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about order, Halmos, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about order, Halmos, William Elliot
• Can anybody help me to find a potential application for this mathematical problem, Simon . SCh . 000
• www.bizimelimiz.com, www.bizimelimiz.com
• Re: Inflating an "osculating" sphere, James Waldby
  • Message not available
    • Re: Inflating an "osculating" sphere, Alois Steindl
• Usual name of the "geometric" rate of change of a function?, Nicolas Burrus
  • Re: Usual name of the "geometric" rate of change of a function?, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Usual name of the "geometric" rate of change of a function?, Ray Vickson
• Riemann surfaces, Aimless
  • Re: Riemann surfaces, Aimless
• Probability Problem: Random Distribution of Two Types of objects with Different Coordination Numbers, ealass
• Poincare duality, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Simplicial complex structure, sanchopancho80
    • Re: Simplicial complex structure, James Dolan
      • Re: Simplicial complex structure, sanchopancho80
• rotation matrix with offset, mraddatz
  • Re: rotation matrix with offset [solved], mraddatz
• Solutions Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format, trustsolution@xxxxxxxxxxx
• magic in division, aarklon
  • Re: magic in division, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: magic in division, se16
  • Re: magic in division, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: magic in division, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: magic in division, The Qurqirish Dragon
• sums, aarklon
  • Re: sums, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: sums, Tonico
  • Re: sums, Rob Johnson
• Writing with gamma., mina_world
  • Re: Writing with gamma., fishfry
  • Re: Writing with gamma., Tonico
• linear algebra hint, bushidowarrior
  • Re: linear algebra hint, Dave
    • Re: linear algebra hint, Virgil
  • Re: linear algebra hint, Ray Vickson
• Thank you Fred Barnes, Quentin Grady
• Reduced residue system., Saysero
  • Re: Reduced residue system., Bill Dubuque
  • Re: Reduced residue system., Bill Dubuque
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Reduced residue system., Saysero
• Re: subgroups of product groups, Jack Schmidt
  • Re: subgroups of product groups, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: subgroups of product groups, Jack Schmidt
      • Re: subgroups of product groups, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: subgroups of product groups, Jack Schmidt
• BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Toni Lassila
  • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Mensanator
      • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Mensanator
      • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, amy666
      • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: BBC2 TV documentary, Wed 11 Jun 2008, Jeremy Boden
• 2622 Solutions manuals, BERGH
• Credit Cards calculator, sal2174
• Re: no infinite simple abelian group?, Jack Schmidt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: no infinite simple abelian group?, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: no infinite simple abelian group?, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Von Neumann quote, Herman Jurjus
  • Re: Von Neumann quote, Herman Jurjus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Von Neumann quote, amy666
• Angles in R^n, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Angles in R^n, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: Angles in R^n, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Angles in R^n, Dave
• An interesting view., Saysero
  • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
    • Re: An interesting view., Harun Al-Rashid
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
      • Re: An interesting view., Harun Al-Rashid
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
  • Re: An interesting view., Ivar Rosquist
  • Re: An interesting view., Pfsszxt
    • Re: An interesting view., mike3
  • Re: An interesting view., toni . lassila
    • Re: An interesting view., mike3
  • Message not available
    • Re: An interesting view., Greg Neill
  • Message not available
    • Re: An interesting view., Saysero
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
      • Re: An interesting view., T.H. Ray
      • Message not available
      • Re: An interesting view., Saysero
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
      • Re: An interesting view., Saysero
      • Message not available
      • What is a belief? (was Re: An interesting view.), mike3
  • Re: An interesting view., The Judge
  • Re: An interesting view., Risto Lankinen
    • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
  • Re: An interesting view., Gib Bogle
    • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
  • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
    • Re: An interesting view., galathaea
    • Re: An interesting view., T.H. Ray
      • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: An interesting view., T.H. Ray
      • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: An interesting view., T.H. Ray
      • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
      • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: An interesting view., T.H. Ray
      • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: An interesting view., mike3
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
      • Re: An interesting view., mike3
      • Re: An interesting view., Tonico
      • Re: An interesting view., mike3
      • Re: An interesting view., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: An interesting view., mike3
      • Re: An interesting view., T.H. Ray
    • Re: An interesting view., Bill Dubuque
  • Re: An interesting view., I.N. Galidakis
• Science with popcorn.., mina_world
• Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Don Stockbauer
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, sanchopancho80
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Rotwang
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Peter Webb
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Vitalij
    • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Vitalij
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Vitalij
    • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, David Bernier
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Vitalij
    • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Church-Turing thesis and quantum computers, Vitalij
• wholesale cheap china Tiffany Silver Jewelry & 925 Silver necklace,earing,bracelet,rings, lvfashionworld
• Tiffany & Co ,Elsa Peretti® Snake Earrings for sale at www.lvfashionworld.com, lvfashionworld
• Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, abuyoyo
  • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, Derek Holt
    • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, abuyoyo
      • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, abuyoyo
    • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Minimal polynomial of a matrix, under field extension, Bill Dubuque
• Surjective Cellular Automata, thegreenflash08
• Need:Calculus: Study And Solutions Guide by Larson, maximilianvila
• compute sample correlation from correlations of sub-samples, benjamin . d . rogers
• Re: Hard Fourier integral!!!!, SO1OS
• 3d coordiante geometry question, pereges
  • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, Chip Eastham
    • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, pereges
      • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, Chip Eastham
      • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, pereges
      • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, Gib Bogle
      • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, pereges
      • Re: 3d coordiante geometry question, Chip Eastham
• urn model, isabellesup
  • Re: urn model, Ray Vickson
• Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Saysero
  • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Saysero
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Arturo Magidin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Saysero
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Robert Israel
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Mensanator
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, gerry
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, David Bernier
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, mike3
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, OwlHoot
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Robert Israel
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, pauldepstein
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, David Bernier
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, christian.bau
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, David Bernier
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Bill Dubuque
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, Saysero
  • Re: Primes of the form 2^(2^n)+1, dan73
• Green Function, bkuhlensch
• Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, Tonico
    • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, David Bernier
      • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, Don Stockbauer
  • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, I.M. Soloveichik
    • Re: Probably idiotic question about Galois theory, Angus Rodgers
• Linear dynamical systems and eigenvalues, psaffrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Linear dynamical systems and eigenvalues, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Linear dynamical systems and eigenvalues, psaffrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Linear dynamical systems and eigenvalues, Dave
      • Re: Linear dynamical systems and eigenvalues, psaffrey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• maximum eigenvalue of a matrix, novis
  • Re: maximum eigenvalue of a matrix, Alois Steindl
    • Re: maximum eigenvalue of a matrix, novis
      • Re: maximum eigenvalue of a matrix, Alois Steindl
  • Re: maximum eigenvalue of a matrix, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Analysis with sup f., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with sup f., porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Analysis with sup f., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with sup f., David C . Ullrich
• A subtle error here ?, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: A subtle error here ?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: A subtle error here ?, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: A subtle error here ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A subtle error here ?, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: A subtle error here ?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A subtle error here ?, Han de Bruijn
• 2^0=1 formal proof?, jonas . thornvall
  • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Tonico
  • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Jussi Piitulainen
    • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, jonas . thornvall
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Tonico
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, jonas . thornvall
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Tonico
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, jonas . thornvall
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Tonico
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, amzoti
    • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, amzoti
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, temptony
  • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Pfsszxt
  • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Justin
    • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Ralf Bader
    • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, jonas . thornvall
      • Re: 2^0=1 formal proof?, Tonico
• request for solutions manual, navidmob
  • Re: request for solutions manual, Ivar Rosquist
• Hilbert's tenth problem, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Hilbert's tenth problem, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Hilbert's tenth problem, no comment
• New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 09, 2008, PhDs . org
• What is simpler than numbers ?, psihodelia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What is simpler than numbers ?, Frederick Williams
  • Re: What is simpler than numbers ?, Tommy1729
• A problem related to geometric series, livigreen
  • Re: A problem related to geometric series, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: A problem related to geometric series, livigreen
      • Re: A problem related to geometric series, Ray Vickson
    • Re: A problem related to geometric series, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: A problem related to geometric series, livigreen
    • Re: A problem related to geometric series, William Elliot
• Topology with metrizable1,2,3,4., mina_world
  • Re: Topology with metrizable1,2,3,4., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Topology with metrizable1,2,3,4., mina_world
  • Re: Topology with metrizable1,2,3,4., William Elliot
• Is there an axiomatic system whose set of theorems is expressible but not representable?, Charlie-Boo
• What Did Hilbert Believe About a Perfect System of Logic?, Charlie-Boo
• Analysis with arctan.., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with arctan.., William Elliot
    • Re: Analysis with arctan.., mina_world
    • Re: Analysis with arctan.., Frederick Williams
• x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Anvita
  • Message not available
    • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, se16
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: [HS] newsreader was : x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Philippe 92
  • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Rob Johnson
    • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Rob Johnson
    • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, William Elliot
      • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, William Elliot
      • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Rob Johnson
      • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, William Elliot
      • Re: x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Rob Johnson
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re : [OT] Google, Yahoo and newsreaders. was : x^2+y^2=-1 in a quadratic ring, Philippe 92
• Re: JSH: Newest factoring algorithm, Joshua Cranmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Newest factoring algorithm, Jesse F. Hughes
• This Equation's Name?, John Schutkeker
  • Re: This Equation's Name?, Robert Israel
    • Re: This Equation's Name?, John Schutkeker
      • Re: This Equation's Name?, Ray Vickson
• Powers of 2., Saysero
  • Re: Powers of 2., Mensanator
  • Re: Powers of 2., Rotwang
    • Re: Powers of 2., Rotwang
  • Re: Powers of 2., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Powers of 2., Saysero
      • Re: Powers of 2., The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Powers of 2., Pubkeybreaker
• Not an integer., Saysero
  • Re: Not an integer., Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Not an integer., Robert Israel
• question about prime partition, daniel tisdale
  • Re: question about prime partition, William Elliot
    • Re: question about prime partition, daniel tisdale
• An algebraic geometry problem, MCT
  • Re: An algebraic geometry problem, MCT
    • Re: An algebraic geometry problem, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: An algebraic geometry problem, MCT
• Entropy of a binary sequence, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Entropy of a binary sequence, Michal Przybylek
• help with Fourier transform, andrew
  • Re: help with Fourier transform, Ray Vickson
• N, Q and R, Dominijanni Simone
  • Re: N, Q and R, Tonico
  • Re: N, Q and R, A N Niel
    • Re: N, Q and R, Dominijanni Simone
    • Re: N, Q and R, Dominijanni Simone
      • Re: N, Q and R, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: N, Q and R, Dominijanni Simone
• Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., mina_world
  • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., mina_world
    • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Tonico
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., mina_world
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Robert Israel
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., mina_world
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Tonico
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Tonico
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Tonico
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Tonico
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Tonico
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Linear algebra with eigenvalue AB., Angus Rodgers
• Turing machines and the theorems of Goedel, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Turing machines and the theorems of Goedel, Michal Przybylek
    • Re: Turing machines and the theorems of Goedel, Charlie-Boo
  • Re: Turing machines and the theorems of Goedel, Charlie-Boo
• How to prove eigen-spectra is real valued?, Chris H. Fleming
  • Re: How to prove eigen-spectra is real valued?, Chris H. Fleming
  • Re: How to prove eigen-spectra is real valued?, Toni Lassila
    • Re: How to prove eigen-spectra is real valued?, Chris H. Fleming
• Calculus with e., mina_world
  • Re: Calculus with e., Ray Vickson
  • Re: Calculus with e., Robert Israel
  • Re: Calculus with e., Bart Goddard
• Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums, Michael
  • Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums, Albert
    • Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums, Albert
• Professional network for mathematicians, vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Throw n balls into m boxes, chhealey
  • Re: Throw n balls into m boxes, kunzmilan
  • Re: Throw n balls into m boxes, Ray Vickson
  • Re: Throw n balls into m boxes, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Throw n balls into m boxes, Chip Eastham
• Accelerated Jerk, symphony
• learn maths from 0 to infinity, k . zen
• Critical Information: Every(x)+Any(x)+Some(x)+Non(x), Zim Olson
• Newbie Qustion about variable sets in Lawvere "Sets for Mathematics", Simon Crase
• Re: polynomial interpolation, Gerry Myerson
• Almost infinite, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Almost infinite, Phil Carmody
• Almost inifinite, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Almost inifinite, Rolf
    • Re: Almost inifinite, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Almost inifinite, Virgil
      • Re: Almost inifinite, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Almost inifinite, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: Almost inifinite, Virgil
      • Re: Almost inifinite, Mark Nudelman
  • Re: Almost inifinite, cbrown
    • Re: Almost inifinite, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Almost inifinite, Hauke Reddmann
• Sum of squares., Saysero
  • Re: Sum of squares., smn
    • Re: Sum of squares., Philippe 92
      • Re: Sum of squares., smn
      • Re: Sum of squares., James Waldby
      • Re: Sum of squares., Philippe 92
      • Re: Sum of squares., James Waldby
    • Re: Sum of squares., smn
      • Re: Sum of squares., Saysero
      • Re: Sum of squares., christian.bau
      • Re: Sum of squares., Saysero
      • Re: Sum of squares., Nathan
      • Re: Sum of squares., Saysero
• Re: Eigenfunction Expansion, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Eigenfunction Expansion, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Eigenfunction Expansion, David Moran
• Comple power series, TCL
  • Re: Comple power series, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Comple power series, TCL
      • Re: Comple power series, Robert Israel
      • Re: Comple power series, TCL
• Geometry with triangleABC., mina_world
  • Re: Geometry with triangleABC., mina_world
    • Re: Geometry with triangleABC., Philippe 92
      • Re: Geometry with triangleABC., mina_world
      • Re: Geometry with triangleABC., mina_world
      • Re: Geometry with triangleABC., Philippe 92
• Group Cohomology, publiosulpicio@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Group Cohomology, Jack Schmidt
  • Re: Group Cohomology, Derek Holt
• Power series question., Saysero
  • Re: Power series question., A N Niel
  • Re: Power series question., David C . Ullrich
• nice link, happy
  • Re: nice link, Ivar Rosquist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • nice link, happy
• -- Angle Between Infinite Dim Vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: -- Angle Between Infinite Dim Vectors, Ray Koopman
    • Re: -- Angle Between Infinite Dim Vectors-, JEMebius
    • Re: -- Angle Between Infinite Dim Vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Question about symmetric functions, leox
  • Re: Question about symmetric functions, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Equation for a printable titration curve, Quentin Grady
  • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, karl
    • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, Quentin Grady
  • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, Mensanator
    • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, Quentin Grady
      • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, Mensanator
      • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, Quentin Grady
      • Re: Equation for a printable titration curve, Mensanator
• Existential Indeterminacy, AOC, QM, assorted mayhem., Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
  • Re: Existential Indeterminacy, AOC, QM, assorted mayhem., Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
    • Re: Existential Indeterminacy, AOC, QM, assorted mayhem., Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: Existential Indeterminacy, AOC, QM, assorted mayhem., Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: Existential Indeterminacy, AOC, QM, assorted mayhem., Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
      • Re: Existential Indeterminacy, AOC, QM, assorted mayhem., Tomoko Kanazawa dom arigato
• example of a normed space that isn't uniformly convex?, zillow10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: example of a normed space that isn't uniformly convex?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: example of a normed space that isn't uniformly convex?, zillow10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• الخاتم الهزاز بالصور لاول مرة, ماريا
• What is the palindrome of a vector called?, junoexpress
  • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, MoeBlee
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?-, JEMebius
  • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Gib Bogle
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Rotwang
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, John O'Flaherty
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, junoexpress
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Michael Press
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, MoeBlee
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, David Bernier
  • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, William Elliot
    • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?-, JEMebius
      • Re: What is the (...) palindromic transformation in 4D, JEMebius
      • Re: What is the (...) palindromic transformation in 4D, Virgil
  • Re: What is the palindrome of a vector called?, RogerB
• Re: String Theory Summarized, T.H. Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: String Theory Summarized, T.H. Ray
    • Re: String Theory Summarized, spudnik
• Re: Number with a_n.., Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Number with a_n.., mina_world
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Number with a_n.., Butch Malahide
    • Re: Number with a_n.., mina_world
  • Re: Number with a_n.., Michael Press
• Heine-Borel Lemma, Narek Saribekyan
  • Re: Heine-Borel Lemma, Tonico
    • Re: Heine-Borel Lemma, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Heine-Borel Lemma, William Elliot
  • Re: Heine-Borel Lemma-, JEMebius
  • Re: Heine-Borel Lemma, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Heine-Borel Lemma, G. A. Edgar
• Impossible? (a math problem), livigreen
  • Re: Impossible? (a math problem), Robert Israel
• What are 5-dimensional polytopes?, David Chmelik
  • Re: What are 5-dimensional polytopes?-, JEMebius
• Re: Splitting a number, Ted Hwa
  • Re: Splitting a number, Butch Malahide
• Re: Rectifiability and Minkowski dimension, Yihong
• Existence of solution to Laplace's PDE, joe blow
  • Re: Existence of solution to Laplace's PDE, Robert Israel
    • Re: Existence of solution to Laplace's PDE, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: Existence of solution to Laplace's PDE, joe blow
      • Re: Existence of solution to Laplace's PDE, David C . Ullrich
• Exciting Race Algorithm, jstiehm
• Re: New symbolic/numeric/dynamic/intuitive programming language, Dave Parker
• Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, lantan
  • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Peter Webb
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Peter Webb
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Peter Webb
      • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Rob Johnson
    • Re: How many rational-not integral points are there on the curve x^2+y^2-2=, Gerry Myerson
• Hilbert Spaces, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Rotwang
    • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Rotwang
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, David Bernier
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Rotwang
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Rotwang
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, David Bernier
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Rotwang
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Rotwang
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Hilbert Spaces, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Hilbert Spaces, BURT
• Re: Our Phi Earth, Stevepppp
  • Re: Our Phi Earth, kibby
• Mathematical Puzzles & Problems Newsletter, Saysero
• Re: What is Spearman rank correlation test?, don wire
• Interesting 3-D geometrical result, Dave L. Renfro
• Algebra with factor group, function., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with factor group, function., William Elliot
    • Re: Algebra with factor group, function., mina_world
• Sage 10, Nancy France, Oct 10-15, 2008, TimDaly
  • Re: Sage 10, Nancy France, Oct 10-15, 2008, Mensanator
• Coefficients of factors of x^n-1, Alasdair
  • Re: Coefficients of factors of x^n-1, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Coefficients of factors of x^n-1, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Coefficients of factors of x^n-1, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Coefficients of factors of x^n-1, Michael Press
  • Re: Coefficients of factors of x^n-1, Robert Israel
• Complex analysis with pole and series., mina_world
  • Re: Complex analysis with pole and series., Tim Norfolk
    • Re: Complex analysis with pole and series., mina_world
• pencil puzzle and Euler, aarklon
  • Re: pencil puzzle and Euler, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: pencil puzzle and Euler, Rick Decker
      • Re: pencil puzzle and Euler, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: pencil puzzle and Euler, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: pencil puzzle and Euler, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: pencil puzzle and Euler, David C . Ullrich
• Integral[ Sin[x]/x ], Narek Saribekyan
  • Re: Integral[ Sin[x]/x ], Tonico
  • Re: Integral[ Sin[x]/x ], Passerby
  • Re: Integral[ Sin[x]/x ], David C . Ullrich
  • Message not available
    • Re: Integral[ Sin[x]/x ], Tonico
• thermodynamics....book link needed, mohsinzubair
• Math Fail, zfolwick
• offering help on HS/college algebra homework, gk712
• Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, JEMebius
      • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Polar equation 1/r = 1 + epsilon*cos(theta/2): name of curve?, Angus Rodgers
• Halting problem, sanchopancho80
  • Re: Halting problem, Michal Przybylek
    • Re: Halting problem, sanchopancho80
• 'Recursively enumerable' sets, sanchopancho80
  • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, sanchopancho80
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, christian.bau
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, christian.bau
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, David Bernier
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Narek Saribekyan
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Narek Saribekyan
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, tommy1729
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, sanchopancho80
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Dave Seaman
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, sanchopancho80
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, tommy1729
  • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Tim Little
    • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, sanchopancho80
  • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
  • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
    • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, sanchopancho80
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, David Bernier
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, MoeBlee
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
      • Re: 'Recursively enumerable' sets, Michael Press
  • Re: 'Turing computable' sets, sanchopancho80
    • Re: 'Turing computable' sets, MoeBlee
• How to simplify a expression?, leox
  • Re: How to simplify a expression?, Rob Johnson
    • Re: How to simplify a expression?, leox
      • Re: How to simplify a expression?, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How to simplify a expression?, leox
• very important for your life…, blue . blue3830
• life with money, blue . blue3830
• NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, sanchopancho80
  • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, sanchopancho80
      • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, Ray Vickson
      • Re: NP, P and the problem of finding a proof, sanchopancho80
• Complex Series, mitch
  • Re: Complex Series, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: Complex Series, mitch
      • Re: Complex Series, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Complex Series, mitch
  • Re: Complex Series, Ray Vickson
• What CAS can do this?, javaguy11111@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What CAS can do this?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: What CAS can do this?, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: What CAS can do this?, javaguy11111@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What CAS can do this?, javaguy11111@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What CAS can do this?, amzoti
  • Re: What CAS can do this?, Dave Seaman
  • Re: What CAS can do this?, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: What CAS can do this?, javaguy11111@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What CAS can do this?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What CAS can do this?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: What CAS can do this?, Axel Vogt
    • Re: What CAS can do this?, Robert Israel
      • Re: What CAS can do this?, Dirk Van de moortel
• Save 60% on Data Entry, Data Conversion, Data Processing Services by Offshore-Data-Entry, dataentryoffshore
• minimum, KY
  • Re: minimum, Greg Neill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: minimum, don wire
• Continuous bijection (not necessarily homeo), Harun Al-Rashid
  • Re: Continuous bijection (not necessarily homeo), Dominijanni Simone
    • Re: Continuous bijection (not necessarily homeo), A N Niel
  • Re: Continuous bijection (not necessarily homeo), Adrian Duma
  • Re: Continuous bijection (not necessarily homeo), Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• Science Earthquake Prediction, Richter
• Re: Irreducible surjective maps, Jose Capco
  • Re: Irreducible surjective maps, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• you nude than boobs, karthickkeyan341
• A fitting/approximation/smoothing problem using polynomials, Jose Capco
• solution of case, ubaidhaq
• Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, Virgil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, cbrown
      • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, Scott Graber
    • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor, Aatu Koskensilta
• I'm bored with the process of studying, Albert
  • Re: I'm bored with the process of studying, Tonico
• Bounded sets in tvs, tttttesten
  • Re: Bounded sets in tvs, fjblurt
    • Re: Bounded sets in tvs, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Bounded sets in tvs, hagman
  • Re: Bounded sets in tvs, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Bounded sets in tvs, tttttesten
• I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., bearnol
  • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., Tonico
  • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., bearnol
    • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., Tonico
    • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., bearnol
      • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., Dik T. Winter
      • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., bearnol
      • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., David Bernier
      • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., bearnol
      • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., bearnol
      • Re: I have solved the St. Petersburg Paradox..., beeworks
• Re: Partitioning a square to a fixed sized rectangles., Tim Little
  • Re: Partitioning a square to a fixed sized rectangles., no . glamour
• Re: Best Scientists in World., Red
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best Scientists in World., Red
• Love your maths and science, vidhya
• Complex polynomial, kaighin
  • Re: Complex polynomial, Dave
• Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Shadow503
  • Re: Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Mensanator
  • Re: Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Michael Press
    • Re: Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Mensanator
      • Re: Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Shadow503
      • Re: Choose 3 out of 5 vegetables, Michael Press
• send SMS from your gmail, messagingbay1
• Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
  • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, mishme0912
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
      • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
    • Re: Comprehensive Solution Manual for Textbooks, qbooks4sale
• Computing the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, goodchild . trevor
  • Re: Computing the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Computing the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Computing the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, goodchild . trevor
      • Re: Computing the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, José Carlos Santos
• Loxodrome, Christopher Kolago
  • Re: Loxodrome-, JEMebius
• Open sets in R^n, Christopher Kolago
  • Re: Open sets in R^n, Bill
    • Re: Open sets in R^n, Virgil
      • Re: Open sets in R^n, Tim Little
      • Re: Open sets in R^n, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: Open sets in R^n, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Open sets in R^n, The World Wide Wade
• A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, OwlHoot
  • Re: A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, Phil Carmody
    • Re: A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, Bill Taylor
      • Re: A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: A Proof of the Odd Perfect Number Conjecture?, Gerry Myerson
• 2-element generating sets of S_n, Alon Amit
  • Re: 2-element generating sets of S_n, Derek Holt
    • Re: 2-element generating sets of S_n, Alon Amit
  • Re: 2-element generating sets of S_n, Jack Schmidt
• SOLUTION MANUAL in PDF file, ejabran
• ? prob density func of likelihood function, Cheng Cosine
• Is estimating a covariancematrix expensive?, saneman
• Re: Atomistic lattices, JohnF
• Re: Art Buckwald, Namehere
• NEED Help With math problem, Greg
  • Re: NEED Help With math problem, Dave
• Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Sharon
  • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Sharon
    • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Martin Wanvik
    • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?-, JEMebius
  • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Ray Vickson
  • Re: Why is dx dy equivalent to r dr dt?, Timothy Murphy
• Solution Manual to Probability and Statistics for Engineers, 7/e Miller & Freund, honesttussey
• general volume of cone in n dimension, novis
  • Re: general volume of cone in n dimension, Chip Eastham
• Question about the definition of well-posed problem, luca . pamparana
  • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, luca . pamparana
      • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, luca . pamparana
      • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, luca . pamparana
  • Re: Question about the definition of well-posed problem, A N Niel
• Matrix problem, Saysero
  • Re: Matrix problem, Saysero
    • Re: Matrix problem, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Matrix problem, Dave
  • Re: Matrix problem, Saysero
  • Re: Matrix problem, Robert Israel
    • Re: Matrix problem, Saysero
      • Re: Matrix problem, Saysero
• Re: Solution Manual of Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, monerd
• DO u want job, softmani100
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • DO u want job, softmani100
• DO u want job, softmani100
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • DO u want job, softmani100
• Re: Who Created God?, Pfsszxt
  • Re: Who Created God?, Han de Bruijn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Who Created God?, richard miller
  • Re: Who Created God?, Zim Olson
  • Re: Who Created God?, Zim Olson
    • Re: Who Created God?, Mensanator
• help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Daniel J. Greenhoe
  • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, filipovic81
    • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Chip Eastham
  • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Chip Eastham
    • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Daniel J. Greenhoe
      • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Chip Eastham
      • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Daniel J. Greenhoe
      • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Chip Eastham
      • Re: help solving polynomial equation used in wavelet design, Daniel J. Greenhoe
• A problem with harmonic functions, LordBeotian
  • Re: A problem with harmonic functions, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: A problem with harmonic functions, LordBeotian
      • Re: A problem with harmonic functions, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: A problem with harmonic functions, Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum
• debugging newsreader -- please ignore --- sorry, Daniel J. Greenhoe
• PHONE TALK KEY WORDS, mahe3s
• Re: Method suggestion for maximizing a multi-linear function over, Robert Israel
• x^{p^n}-x+1 over F_p, billadscft
• from S6 to M12, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: from S6 to M12, Ted Hwa
    • Re: from S6 to M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: from S6 to M12, Ted Hwa
• Bessel function, order 0, negative input, Mapsread
  • Re: Bessel function, order 0, negative input, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Number of non-homotopic curves, jane
  • Re: Number of non-homotopic curves, jane
    • Re: Number of non-homotopic curves, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• air max 360 paypal cnbbiz2008@hotmail.com ( http://photo.163.com/photos/huayuexiehang/126072873/ ), cnbbiz2007
• Center of the tree, mark
  • Re: Center of the tree, hagman
    • Re: Center of the tree, Peter Webb
      • Re: Center of the tree, David Hartley
      • Re: Center of the tree, David Hartley
• Stoke's Theorem, don wire
  • Re: Stoke's Theorem, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Robert Israel
    • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Cork Soaker
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Joshua Cranmer
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Cork Soaker
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Joshua Cranmer
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Anthony Buckland
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Stoke's Theorem, Cork Soaker
  • Re: Stoke's Theorem, PiperAlpha167
• The most comprehensive furniture information .You will find the most suitable for you!, shoubiao189
• A combinatoric problem involving number of monomials, Jose Capco
  • Re: A combinatoric problem involving number of monomials, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: A combinatoric problem involving number of monomials, Jose Capco
• china authentic&discount jordan shoes 1,2,3,4 jordan sneaker from china supplier, Alex
• Bhattacharyya distance - intuition?, saneman
• Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, hanrahan398
  • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, se16
    • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Frederick Williams
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, hanrahan398
  • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, A N Niel
    • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Rotwang
    • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, hanrahan398
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, fjmd1a@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, hanrahan398
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, A N Niel
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, hanrahan398
      • Re: Cambridge - world's best undergrad maths course?, Timothy Murphy
• Determinant of Inertia, Han de Bruijn
• Nike Shoes, chinagood088
• Divide by zero, Cork Soaker
  • Re: Divide by zero, Tonico
    • Re: Divide by zero, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Divide by zero, rossum
    • Re: Divide by zero, Cork Soaker
  • Re: Divide by zero, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: Divide by zero, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Divide by zero, Adam Burley
    • Re: Divide by zero, Cork Soaker
      • Re: Divide by zero, hagman
• New mathematics / physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Jun 02, 2008, PhDs . org
• irreducible polynomial over Q, joe ferral
  • Re: irreducible polynomial over Q, hagman
    • Re: irreducible polynomial over Q, Timothy Murphy
• Galois resolvent, Kent Holing
• You should know this man, af_1999
  • Re: You should know this man, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: You should know this man, Tonico
  • Re: You should know this man, Angus Rodgers
• Re: 369d-per-y, tommy1729
• dont be silly, tommy1729
  • Re: dont be silly, no . glamour
    • Re: dont be silly, Ross
• sequence of tails of integrals, jigyasu.swabhav@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: sequence of tails of integrals, jigyasu.swabhav@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: sequence of tails of integrals, jigyasu.swabhav@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: sequence of tails of integrals, The World Wide Wade
• Functional analysis: Riesz representation theorem, fjblurt
  • Re: Functional analysis: Riesz representation theorem, Bill
    • Re: Functional analysis: Riesz representation theorem, Bill
• Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, nyskylight
  • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, TCL
    • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, Chip Eastham
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, nyskylight
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, Chip Eastham
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, Chip Eastham
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, nyskylight
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, TCL
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, nyskylight
    • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, TCL
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, TCL
      • Re: fixed point iteration in Hilbert Spaces, nyskylight
• Base of the wreath product, newsgr . mail
  • Re: Base of the wreath product, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Base of the wreath product, newsgr . mail
      • Re: Base of the wreath product, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Base of the wreath product, Adam Burley
    • Re: Base of the wreath product, Arturo Magidin
• Relative primes problem., Saysero
  • Re: Relative primes problem., Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Relative primes problem., bert
  • Re: Relative primes problem., Saysero
    • Re: Relative primes problem., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Relative primes problem., Bill Dubuque
• david turning things around., tommy1729
  • Re: david turning things around., David C . Ullrich
• Re: I seek free paper about Denjoy o Henstock integral paper, Dominijanni Simone
• need help solving involving inequalities, zillow10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, zillow10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, Dominijanni Simone
    • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, Dominijanni Simone
  • Re: need help solving involving inequalities, The World Wide Wade
• Illustrative 2nd order ode, Kaba
  • Re: Illustrative 2nd order ode, Robert Israel
    • Re: Illustrative 2nd order ode, Kaba
• Analysis with series 3n., mina_world
  • Re: Analysis with series 3n., The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Analysis with series 3n., mina_world
• A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., leox
  • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
    • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., leox
      • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., leox
      • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., leox
      • Re: A question about character of representation of Lie algebra sl_3., leox
• A lot of Solution Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format!, trustsolution
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A lot of Solution Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format!, trustsolution
  • A lot of Solution Manuals in Electronic (PDF)Format!, trustsolution
• Turing machine, spellbound
  • Re: Turing machine, Mensanator
  • Re: Turing machine, Adam Burley
• Algebra with Z_2(b)., mina_world
  • Re: Algebra with Z_2(b)., Derek Holt
    • Re: Algebra with Z_2(b)., mina_world
• Re: THE LARGEST PRIME NUMBER., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: THE LARGEST PRIME NUMBER., bill
    • Re: THE LARGEST PRIME NUMBER., David C . Ullrich
• Lost on rigged Hilbert space, kalcifire
  • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, Mate
    • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, kalcifire
      • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, Martin Wanvik
      • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, kalcifire
      • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, kalcifire
      • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, Martin Wanvik
      • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Lost on rigged Hilbert space, kalcifire
• Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
  • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, Shubee
    • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
      • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, Shubee
      • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
    • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, Gottfried Helms
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
    • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, Shubee
      • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
  • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
  • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
  • Re: David Hilbert's Explanation of Albert Einstein's Success, T.H. Ray
• Characterization of N., Saysero
  • Re: Characterization of N., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Characterization of N., Saysero
      • Re: Characterization of N., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Characterization of N., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Characterization of N., Saysero
      • Re: Characterization of N., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Characterization of N., Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: Characterization of N., David C. Ullrich
  • Re: Characterization of N., Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Characterization of N., Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Characterization of N., Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Characterization of N., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Characterization of N., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Characterization of N., David C. Ullrich
  • Re: Characterization of N., Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Characterization of N., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Characterization of N., Dave Seaman
      • Re: Characterization of N., David C. Ullrich
  • Re: Characterization of N., David C. Ullrich
    • Re: Characterization of N., Saysero
      • Re: Characterization of N., David C. Ullrich
• hai, psprabus1
• china dicount lv dunk atl jordan at cheap price, chinagood006
• Re: Permutations from 1 to 12..., gamouning
• Slope?, Marc Loriau
  • Re: Slope?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Slope?, David L. Wilson
  • Re: Slope?, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Slope?, Steve Kliff
  • Re: Slope?, Mensanator
    • Re: Slope?, Mensanator
• Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, tommy1729
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, James Redford
    • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, amy666
      • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, Dan Drake
    • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, Dan Drake
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, T.H. Ray
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, amy666
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, Zim Olson
    • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, Zim Olson
  • Re: God Proven to Exist According to Mainline Physics, Zim Olson
• Re: Non-constructible root combinations for the cubic and quartic, tommy1729
• Re: yeah sure !!!, amy666
  • Re: yeah sure !!!, Tonico
  • Re: yeah sure !!!, mike3
    • Re: yeah sure !!!, Albert
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, Tonico
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, Philippe 92
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, Tonico
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, Albert
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, Albert
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, Philippe 92
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: yeah sure !!!, mike3
    • Re: yeah sure !!!, Tonico
      • Re: yeah sure !!!, mike3
  • Re: yeah sure !!!, mike3
    • Re: yeah sure !!!, David C . Ullrich
• Re: Simplfication of exponential integral sum, Raymond Manzoni
  • Re: Simplfication of exponential integral sum, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: Simplfication of exponential integral sum, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: Simplfication of exponential integral sum, Raymond Manzoni
      • Re: Simplfication of exponential integral sum, Gottfried Helms
• Re: Laplace Transforms, Mixed Derivatives, and PDEs, galathaea
  • Re: Laplace Transforms, Mixed Derivatives, and PDEs, David Moran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Laplace Transforms, Mixed Derivatives, and PDEs, Ray Vickson
    • Re: Laplace Transforms, Mixed Derivatives, and PDEs, David Moran
      • Message not available
      • Re: Laplace Transforms, Mixed Derivatives, and PDEs, David Moran
• Re: Little calculus problem., galathaea
• Re: -- Polynomial approximation for 1/(x+a) in large domain., Axel Vogt
  • Re: -- Polynomial approximation for 1/(x+a) in large domain., Srikanth
    • Re: -- Polynomial approximation for 1/(x+a) in large domain., Srikanth
• Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, persres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Ted Hwa
    • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, persres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Ted Hwa
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, persres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Dave
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Dave
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: A simple proof involving Peano's axioms, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
• Re: Mathematics of poker, Virgil