Re: An interesting view.
- From: "T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:39:17 EDT
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:21:58 EDT, "T.H. Ray"Then what's with the crap about tears in his eyes over
<thray123@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Angus wrote:
[Actually, I was quoting]
Einstein held that the main source of thepresent-day conflicts between
the spheres of religion and of science lay in "theconcept of a personal
God" for that was to think of God in ananthropomorphic way, and to
project into him figurative images and humanpsychological notions of
personality, which give rise, he held, to religiouspractices of worship
and notions of providence shaped in accordance withhuman selfish
desires. [...]
Pure nonsense.Einstein
[...]
The easily verified and very simple fact is, that
most certainly did not believe in a personal god.He was
very clear on that subject [...]
As you can verify by reading what I posted! Duh.
--
some priest calling him an atheist?
Tom
Angus Rodgers.
(twirlip@ eats spam; reply to angusrod@)
Contains mild peril
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An interesting view.
- From: Tonico
- Re: An interesting view.
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: An interesting view.
- References:
- Re: An interesting view.
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: An interesting view.
- Prev by Date: Re: 1 = -1 math puzzle
- Next by Date: Re: An interesting view.
- Previous by thread: Re: An interesting view.
- Next by thread: Re: An interesting view.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|