Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums
- From: Albert <albert.xtheunknown0@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 11, 10:04 am, Gerry Myerson <ge...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In articleI did not submit something which I only got with help. In fact, I just
<4cdc71cf-61e2-40b3-b6c7-4acf7d71f...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Albert <albert.xtheunkno...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do not really see the point of not getting help because the
organisers want me and others to be challenged in order to be able
to solve the problem. Think about this carefully: If it was not a
challenge, I would not have to post in an internet forum. Therefore,
I have been challenged. However, I still cannot solve the problem.
Therefore, it makes perfect sense to ask for help from an internet
forum.
But it doesn't make sense to submit as your own work
something which you only got with help. Or rather it makes
sense but it's cheating. It's cheating unless you acknowledge
with your submission the exact details of the help you got.
--
Gerry Myerson (ge...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
did a tree diagram of all the possibilities and it did not actually
take that long.
Yes, you are right. I have never, am not, will never deny that I
cheated.
.
- References:
- Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums
- From: Michael
- Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums
- From: Albert
- Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums
- Prev by Date: Re: log convex function
- Next by Date: Re: Matrix Algebra question
- Previous by thread: Re: I5. Circular Prime Sums
- Next by thread: Calculus with e.
- Index(es):