Re: Time. /My opinion./
- From: socratus <israelsad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
One comment.
===================
Jud:
/My Opinion/
*Time* is a reificational myth - a helpful fiction and the ideative
product of the human brain.
Like *number, movement, speed, appearance, being, energy, force...
*time* is a metaphysical creation of mankind employed in order to
enable him to
interface with other causal objects (other that is - to the causal,
abstracting, reificative object which is ...himself.)
Although utterly unscientific, these abstractions are required in
order for science to do its business of measuring and making
deterministically engendered predictions. Only when scientists grasp
that it is not the * behaviour * of objects that exists - but
* behaving objects* will the big TOE discoveries take place.
Put another way - *time* does not exist ... only (humanly) *timed
objects* exist.
Best wishes,
Jud Evans.
================..
Dear Jud Evans.
I have read your comment with interest.
1.
From one hand, it seems you are right. Why?
There are different definitions: * movement,
speed, energy, force, charge, spin, field ...etc *
The physicists take these definitions as independent
physical characteristics and when some of them say:
“ We are always using these concepts but not
a singe physicist in the world today knows what
they really mean * deep down* ”
/ Book “ ABC ’s of Quantum mechanics”
by V. Rydnik. Page 315./
2.
From another hand, it seems you aren’t correct. Why?
Being a boy and a young man I was beaten many times
or as a Jew, or because I was right ,or it seems to
me that I was right but I was fool. So, I know by
my teeth how the physical parameters like
* movement, speed, energy, force, ...* are real and effective.
And now, as an old experienced man, I came to conclusion that
the physicists were never beaten and therefore they didn’t
know that the physical definitions like * movement,
speed, energy, force, charge, spin, field ...etc *
must be bound with concrete particle (object- subject)
which (who ) is a possessor of these characteristics or can
produce these characteristics. When they understand
this fact the situation will became clear.
3.
You wrote:
Put another way - *time* does not exist ... only (humanly) *timed
objects* exist.
I think to solve your suggestion is like to solve equation:
“ infinity + 1= ? ”
4.
Maybe it is better to take objects like a light quanta or an
electron and try to understand why they are * timed objects*
5.
If you don’t like words * movement, speed, energy, force...*
change them into formulas and write them down, step by step,
for explaining the Existence as I do;
a) T=0K
b) h=c=0, R/N=k, E/M=c^2, C/D=pi, i^2=-1
c) h=c=1, h=Et, h=kb
d) h=h/2pi, c>1, e^2= ahc.
e) etc…
Maybe you will do this work better then me.
=======..
Be lucky and not being beaten in the future.
Best wishes,
Israel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time. /My opinion./
- From: socratus
- Re: Time. /My opinion./
- References:
- Time. /My opinion./
- From: socratus
- Re: Time. /My opinion./
- From: SO1OS
- Re: Time. /My opinion./
- From: socratus
- Time. /My opinion./
- Prev by Date: Re: Least squares similarity transformation
- Next by Date: Re: Collatz Conjecture proof?
- Previous by thread: Re: Time. /My opinion./
- Next by thread: Re: Time. /My opinion./
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
