Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: James Waldby <no@xxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:06:45 -0500
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:37:06 -0700, Michael Press wrote:
[...] Mensanator <mensanator@xxxxxxx> wrote:[...]
But I would prefer a series that converges in ~300 terms to the one
that converges in ~10**34 terms.
How about Ramanujan's series that gets eight decimal places for each
term?
1 2.sqrt{2} (4n)! [1103 + 26390n]
-- = --------- sum_n ------- ---------------
pi 9801 (n!)^4 (4*99)^4n
[Call this series R]
Also look up Euler's (who else?) transformation for accelerating
alternating series. In essence a difference table. Abramowitz and
Stegun, 3.6.27.
<http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulersSeriesTransformation.html>
M. previously said he is using gmp rational arithmetic, so might
rule out R because of its sqrt(2) multiplier. On a different
tack, computing one term of R is as expensive as computing several
terms of Machin's formula. (Perhaps 13 multiplies, 1 divide, and
some adds per R term, vs. 2 multiplies, 1 divide, and some adds per
Machin term.)
mathworld doesn't seem to mention the Van Wijngaarden variant of Euler's
transform, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Wijngaarden_transformation
-jiw
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: Michael Press
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- References:
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: Maury Barbato
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: Mensanator
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: Mensanator
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- From: Michael Press
- Re: A Formula for Pi
- Prev by Date: Re: -- tetration: news on series of increasing heights of powertowers (tetra-series)
- Next by Date: Re: Hardy space H^1
- Previous by thread: Re: A Formula for Pi
- Next by thread: Re: A Formula for Pi
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|