Re: Calculus doesn't apply to the unchanging curve

In article
<3f70297c-2e93-42e7-a61a-f24ce72e471b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
BURT <macromitch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 23, 10:05 pm, Ray Vickson <RGVick...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 23, 9:57 pm, BURT <macromi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jun 23, 3:49 pm, "T.H. Ray" <thray...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 23, 12:28 pm, "T.H. Ray" <thray...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
mitch:

something of zero dimension cannot have slope.

Which is kind of like saying that a dog is not a
cat.

What are you trying to say, and why should anyone
be
interested?

Tom

A circle or any round geometry is an unchanging curve
and therefore
can't be treated by calculus.

Not true.  As you should know by now.  A circle is
obviously not "zero dimension" as you claimed.  Enough.

Tom

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You cannot deny the circle as an unchanging curve.

I can truthfully claim that I don't know what you mean by an
"unchanging curve".

R.G. Vickson





Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I mean round curvature Ray. Circle sphere and hypersphere.

Mitch Raemsch

And the definition of curvature for a smooth curve is ...?
.

Quantcast