Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- From: Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2008 19:55:41 +0300
moorthy <cmkmoorthy@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Can somebody provide me some good explanation on Godel's
incompleteness theorem in a simple way.
An excellent and readable source on the incompleteness theorems is
Torkel Franzén's _Gödel's Theorem -- an Incomplete Guide to its Use
and Abuse_.
The first incompleteness theorem states that for any formal theory in
which elementary arithmetic can be carried out we can find a statement
G about the natural numbers with the property that if the theory is
consistent G is true but not formally derivable in the theory.
Here a formal theory consists of a mathematically specified language
together with rules for deriving formulas in the language from other
formulas, with certain formulas specified as axioms. A formal theory
is consistent if by means of the rules it is not possible to derive a
formula of the form "A and not-A" from the axioms. For any given
theory we might take the formula G furnished by the proof to be of the
form "the Diophantine equation D(x1, ..., xn) = 0 has no solutions",
and its being true if the theory is consistent means simply that if no
formula of the form "A and not-A" is derivable by the rules from the
axioms there are no solutions to the Diophantine equation D(x1, ...,
xn) = 0. (The equation depends on the theory in question).
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber müss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophics
.
- References:
- Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- From: moorthy
- Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Prev by Date: Vector's cordinates change: from polar to cartesian system
- Next by Date: Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|