Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:44:55 -0400
Neilist <Neilisted@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Jun 28, 12:57 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Neilist <Neilis...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Complete means that any truthful statement can be derived from the
axioms of the system.
No, it doesn't.
What a lousy response! "No, it doesn't". Childish. I'll just say
"yes it does".
Give the correct definition then, genius (sarcasm)!
A theory T is complete if, for every formula P in the language of T,
either T |- P or T |- ~P.
--
"...you are around so that I have something else to do when I'm not
figuring something important out. I was especially intrigued on this
iteration by cursing, which I think I'll continue at some later date
as it's so amusing." --- James S. Harris
.
- References:
- Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- From: Neilist
- Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Prev by Date: Godel Escher Bach is a great book. Two thumbs up!
- Next by Date: Re: Godel Escher Bach is a great book. Two thumbs up!
- Previous by thread: Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Godel's Incompleteness theorem
- Index(es):