Re: Standardized definitions
- From: rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
- Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:36:08 GMT
In article <32190234.1215170789924.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"G.E. Ivey" <george.ivey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:39 pm, amzoti <amz...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 3, 9:55 pm, pauldepst...@xxxxxxx wrote:1.http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Pi/pi.html
Are there any authorized "standard definitions" for terms like e, pi
etc? My impression is that there isn't and that a wide variety of
definitions are acceptable so long as they are clear and precise and
lead to the correct value.
So, if a student is asked to prove that the sum (over all positive
integers n) of 1/n^2 is pi^2/6, what is to prevent the student from
defining pi to be sqrt(6) * sqrt(sum 1/n^2) ? Is there any
implicit rule that says which definitions of pi are acceptable and
which aren't?
Paul Epstein
2.http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/constants.html
google is your
see the same constants pages for others.
There are many definitions for these on the web -
friend.
Google is a good friend, but a good friend also
listens to others. I
don't think you read my post carefully enough. Of
course, various
websites give various definitions!
The point I was getting at is: Take the following
three definitions
of pi. 1) The circumference of a circle with unit
diameter. 2) The
least positive real z such that cos z (defined via
power series) =
-1. 3) sqrt(6) * sqrt(sum 1/n^2).
My opinion is that the mathematical community would
object to
definition 3 but would find definitions 1 and 2 to be
fine. Why??
What is it about definition 3 that makes it not ok?
What's wrong with it, just as others have said, is that it does
not give the same value the others two doefinitions do. Definitions
1 and 2 can be shown to define the same VALUE. 3 does not. It is
the value that is crucial, not the particular definition.
"sum 1/n^2", accepting the notation, is pi^2/6. Thus, the value of
sqrt(6) * sqrt(sum 1/n^2) is pi.
Furthermore, I don't see any posts in which others claims that
this does not give the same value as the other two definitions.
Rob Johnson <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
take out the trash before replying
to view any ASCII art, display article in a monospaced font
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standardized definitions
- From: Joshua Cranmer
- Re: Standardized definitions
- References:
- Re: Standardized definitions
- From: pauldepstein
- Re: Standardized definitions
- From: G.E. Ivey
- Re: Standardized definitions
- Prev by Date: Computability and Creative Sets
- Next by Date: Re: What has fractal theory achieved?
- Previous by thread: Re: Standardized definitions
- Next by thread: Re: Standardized definitions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|