Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Tonico <Tonicopm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 10, 10:33 am, Bill Dubuque <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tonico <Tonic...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:*****************************************************
He in fact wrote that in another forum when the same situation came
up: he answered a question in a way more complex and misleading way
than, apparently, the OP meant...and why "apparently"? Because the
OP's question was such that it was plain clear she/he had a rather
elementary maths level.
That time though (just 5-7 days ago) he also felt like offending some
other poster who answered that question...
In what imaginary world did that happen? How about a reference
to support that ridiculous unfounded claim. As usual, I think
you've made yet another error and confused me with someone else.
(1) Link: http://tinyurl.com/6e4c3r . The site is "Topology Q+A Board:
Ask an Algebraist", of York Univ.
This quote's date is july 7, 2008. The "lazy, obvious, sloppy" may
refer to me (Tonio), or (some of it, perhaps) may refer the poster you
were answering to. Perhaps this doesn't look offensive to you, whoever
you were referring to...?
Of course, you could say you were talking about me and not about
anyone else, and thus it is not "some other poster"...
****************************************************
******************************************************I DID write to him asking him for something, and I did NOT
find it in the galore of links I had to click on. Later, someone else
said he couldn't find that, or some other, thing, and Bill said then
that he hasn't yet worked out that thing
More lies and/or twisted self-serving characterizations of events.
Again, references?
(2) Quote :
[Tonio] " > Thanx for the links. it's a little messy to follow those
(I already reached once 1999 and other time 2000...), so: do you have
some site where these techniques are written? For example, I tried to
read about the |Adj A| = |A|^(n-1) but I only found links to other
posts with links to other post with links to...*pant*. If all this is
more or less concentrated in some place, book or articles, it'd be
great. "
[Bill] That example I never elaborated on..."
It is from Jun 10, 1:35 AM, in the "Linear Algebra with eigenvalues
AB" thread in this very sci.math forum, post No. 18 (sorted by reply)
This thread is very interesting and, imo, enlightening about what
we've been talking about here, because of the participations of Bill,
Tonio and Arturo, and the opinions expressed there.
Again, you didn't right precisely "I haven't worked out that", but
rather "I never elaborated on"...my bad.
Pleaso do notice it was EXACTLY Adj A and related stuff that we were
talking about, and for what you send people to "prior posts". In post
No. 16 in the same thread, you wrote:
"Below is the link again. FOLLOW THE LINKS, in my prior posts below,
then follow links in these posts, etc, etc, to traverse the entire
tree of said prior posts.
There you'll find many similar examples, e.g. the Cayley-Hamilton
theorem; adj(A) = det(A)^(n-1); Leibniz's product rule for the
derivative of polynomials;..."
Wanna check again, Bill, about who you're accusing of lying?
***************************************************************
That's all I've to say...but Bill doesn't like this,
and then he gets mad and mean, and then...etc.
Eh, have you ever seen me get mad? In fact I find you hilarious.
You are the most preposterous lunatic I've ever encountered in
almost three decades online. You may just yet earn the distinction
of being the first person ever to earn a coveted spot in my forever
empty killfile. If you keep up this lunacy there is no doubt that
the name "Jose Antonio Perez" will earn a place in history right
next to all the other infamous sci.math crackpots.
**************************************************************
Are you sure you still want to talk about crackpots, Bill?? I supose
that remark wasn't also intended to offend, uh? Oooo-kaaaay.
Regards
Tonio
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- References:
- Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: mina_world
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Tonico
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Tonico
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Tonico
- Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Algebra with quotient ring.
- Prev by Date: Re: tetration and logaritms
- Next by Date: Geometry with differential.
- Previous by thread: Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- Next by thread: Re: Algebra with quotient ring.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
