Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- From: Mensanator <mensanator@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 11, 3:50 pm, amy666 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
my conjecture still holds.
reading your paper only seems to support it.
It most certainly does NOT.
Given that:
<Wikipedia>
Some values of the partition function are as follows (sequence A000041
in OEIS):
p(1) = 1
p(2) = 2
p(3) = 3
p(4) = 5
p(5) = 7
p(6) = 11
p(7) = 15
p(8) = 22
p(9) = 30
p(10) = 42
p(100) = 190,569,292
p(1000) = 24,061,467,864,032,622,473,692,149,727,991 ≈ 2.4 × 1031
</Wikipedia>
What do you suppose P(2147483647) is?
Slighty bigger than 23091222, eh?
"Bounded by the partion function" my ass.
For some more light reading, go see
<http://members.aol.com/mensanator/cycle/ultimate_cycle.htm>
regards mensanator666
tommy1729
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- From: amy666
- Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- References:
- Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- From: Mensanator
- Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- From: amy666
- Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- Prev by Date: Re: Divisors
- Next by Date: Re: Divisors
- Previous by thread: Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- Next by thread: Re: collatz conjecture -> a * p(a)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|