Re: tetration and logaritms
- From: Gottfried Helms <helms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:03:47 +0200
Am 10.07.2008 12:57 schrieb Gottfried Helms:
b) Interpolation: in a previous post I discussed a likely
difference of methods, when different interpolation-approaches
depending on the h-parameter are assumed.
You gave a polynomial interpolation approach, which I think is
somehow natural.
But the coefficients at -for instance- x^1 with increasing h
(1,1,1,1,1,...)
can also be interpolated by -for instance- a sine-function of h,
as well as the coefficients at higher powers of x.
My above speculation is useless.
Any interpolation must satisfy its own repeated iteration,
so f°0.5(f°0.5(x)) = f(x) and there is only one unique
solution, at least for powerseries, where f(0) = 0.
This can be seen easily when written out using symbolic
coefficients in the powerseries (there is also an
"uniqueness"-theorem concerning the polynomial inter-
polation)
So this idea does not help to overcome the mentioned
"cross-base-incompatibility"
Sorry - this idea was not well considered
Gottfried
.
- References:
- tetration and logaritms
- From: amy666
- Re: tetration and logaritms
- From: lwalke3
- Re: tetration and logaritms
- From: Gottfried Helms
- tetration and logaritms
- Prev by Date: Re: In search of an approximate solution to the birthday problem
- Next by Date: Re: Able to solve this simple-looking math problem?
- Previous by thread: Re: tetration and logaritms
- Next by thread: Re: tetration and logaritms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading