Re: tommy1729 set axioms
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:04:42 -0400
amy666 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
you have a point there...
but in this case it seems false and true are actually the same.
its like 5 + 0 contains 0 although it equals 5 + 0 - 0.
but by formal definition you and jesse have a point.
Oh, well that's all right then. After all, if false and true happen
to be the same, everything's just fine.
--
"I'd step through arguments in such detail that it was like I was
teaching basic arithmetic and some poster would come back and act like
I hadn't said anything that made sense. For a while I almost started
to doubt myself." -- James S. Harris, so close and yet....
.
- References:
- Re: tommy1729 set axioms
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: tommy1729 set axioms
- From: amy666
- Re: tommy1729 set axioms
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH's next breakthrough
- Next by Date: Re: I hate to ask, but I must - 3 coloring vertex problem
- Previous by thread: Re: tommy1729 set axioms
- Next by thread: Re: tommy1729 set axioms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
