Re: an important set theory post
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:03:32 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:12:20 -0700 (PDT), calvin wrote:
On Jul 26, 1:06 pm, Dave Seaman <dsea...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
Every term in mathematics (except one) has a definition. The one
exception is the symbol for "is an element of" from set theory.
...
You just gave its definition.
Really? What is the definition of "is an element of"?
--
Dave Seaman
Third Circuit ignores precedent in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/29/18489281.php>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- References:
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: an important set theory post
- From: calvin
- Re: an important set theory post
- Prev by Date: Re: Infinite 3d lattice
- Next by Date: Re: an important set theory post
- Previous by thread: Re: an important set theory post
- Next by thread: Re: an important set theory post
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|