Re: Complex Analysis
- From: "David C. Ullrich" <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:38:50 -0500
In article <g7a2eh$bu8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
T-Hope <s0456518@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you very much for the reply. I am still not with you, I'm sorry.
Here's how I see it:
Im=y
|
|
| this minus
| the Re axis
| \/
|
------------------------------------Re=x
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * |* * * * * * * * *
This maps to:
Im=y
|* * * * * * * * *
this minus |* * * * * * * * *
then Im axis >|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
------------------------------------Re=x
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
|* * * * * * * * *
No.
* - not in the set
So say z=exp([pi]i/6) \in S, then f(z)=exp([pi]i/3) which clearly
doesn't lie in the "complex plane minus the non-negative real axis".
That clearly doesn't lie in the set you drew above. But
it does lie in the complex plane minus the non-negative real
axis. Because (i) it's in the complex plane and (ii) it does
not lie on the non-negative real axis.
This is bugging me because the author simply brushes past this as if to
say it's obvious but something just isn't clicking. Thanks for your
patience.
-T
--
David C. Ullrich
.
- References:
- Re: Complex Analysis
- From: T-Hope
- Re: Complex Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Complex Analysis
- Next by Date: Elementary topology
- Previous by thread: Re: Complex Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Complex Analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|