Re: Series of tetrated terms

David C. Ullrich wrote:
[snip]

I would have thought the question was whether we can find
coefficients such that the series converges _to_ exp(x).

Ah, ok. I thought he was _re-defining_ this "Exp(x)" of his.

Mea-culpa. I'll think a bit more about it later.
[snip]
--
I.N. Galidakis

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Series of tetrated terms
  - From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Series of tetrated terms
  - From: gudi
- Re: Series of tetrated terms
  - From: gudi
- Re: Series of tetrated terms
  - From: gudi

References:
- Series of tetrated terms
  - From: gudi
- Re: Series of tetrated terms
  - From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Series of tetrated terms
  - From: David C. Ullrich

Relevant Pages

Re: Series of tetrated terms
... I.N. Galidakis wrote: ... coefficients such that the series converges _to_ exp. ... Mea-culpa. ...
(sci.math)
Re: -- tetration: exact terms for the (T-) tetration matrix-operator
... I.N. Galidakis wrote: ... I don't see agreement on the coefficients of. ... of exp) ...
(sci.math)
Re: Existence of function
... I.N. Galidakis wrote: ... we have the valid implication: ... I am not sure what happens if we qualify the statement ...
(sci.math)
Re: Existence of function
... I.N. Galidakis wrote: ... we have the valid implication: ... I am not sure what happens if we qualify the statement ...
(sci.math)
Re: an interesting sum
... he used an approximation ... of the original function with k running from 1 to ... I.N. Galidakis ...
(sci.math)