Re: Poisson and exponential distributions



On Aug 12, 8:44 pm, "giganut" <giga...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hello,

i'm having some trouble seeing the relationship between the Poisson and the
exp. distributions. specifically,

if the Poisson with rate L and time t is:

P(k| L,t) = (Lt)^k exp(-Lt) / k!

then i think that the exp. process with rate-parameter L, should basically
be P(0| L, t) = exp(-Lt).

No "think" required; it follows right away from the formula.

why doesn't the normalizing constant (1/L) come
out directly from this to give Lexp(-Lt) ?

Because it is not a probability density, so does not need to integrate
to 1. Here is what is happening: P(k| L,t) = probability that exactly
k "arrivals" occur in the time interval [0,t], so P(0|L,t) =
probability of NO arrivals in [0,t] = probability that the first
arrival occurs after t = P{T > t}, where T = time of first arrival.
Thus, the complementary cumulative distribution of T is exp(-L*t),
hence the probability density of T is f(t) = -(d/dt)P{T > t} = L*exp(-
L*t), as desired.

does this have something to do with the fact that P(0| L, t) as above is a
likelihood and not a probability ?

No, it is a probability, *not* a probability DENSITY function.

if so, then using laws of probability,
can the exponential distribution be derived, i.e.:

P(t|0,L) = p(0|L,t)p(t|L) / p(0|L)

conversely, how would one derive the poisson from the exponential
distribution ?

Let T1, T2, ... be the successive inter-arrival times of the process:
T1 = time of first arrival, T2 = time between first and second
arrival, etc. The Ti are independent, identically distributed random
variables with distribution expl(L). The time of the nth arrival is Sn
= T1 + T2 +...+ Tn, which has the so-called n-Erlang distribution,
with density f_n(t) = L^n t^(n-1)* exp(-L*t)/(n-1)! (can get this by
induction, or by Laplace transform methods). We have
P{>= n arrivals in [0,t]} = P{Sn <= t}, because Sn is <= t if and only
if at least n arrivals occur by t. We have P{Sn <= t} =
integral(f_n(s) ds, s=0 .. t). You can use repeated integration by
parts to show this has the form 1 - sum{k=0 .. (n-1)} (L*t)^k exp(-
L*t)/k!, so P{n arrivals} = P{>= n arrivals} - P{>= n+1 arrivals} =
(L*t)^n exp(-Lt)/n! = Poisson probability.

Alternatively, you can develop a set of differential equations for the
Pn(t) = P{n arrivals in [0,t]}, then solve them sequentially, starting
with P0(t) = P{0 arrivals in [0,t]} = P{T1 > t} = exp(-L*t).

Isn't all this material in your course textbook?

R.G. Vickson


thanks,
-g

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question about use of Poisson probabilities
    ... Probability theory was never my forte. ... I'm glad you're not going to call your boss an idiot. ... are a Poisson process, then 700,000 shows much, much, much too ... assumptions about your distribution that you need in order ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Howard Hersheys Challenge of Sean Pitmans Assumptions
    ... Poisson distribution describes the probability of exactly k events ... likely to be found within a fixed distance." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: How to determine whether a process is Poisson
    ... window size, you can calculate the ML estimates of the mean and the ... How can I determine whether this arrival process is Poisson or not? ... how many arrivals in a minute for 120 minutes duration of time. ... If the process is a Poisson process, then the distribution of the number ...
    (sci.stat.math)
  • Re: Probability question
    ... FreeCell in mind) and I want to calculate the probability that I win this ... Sum 0 to inf ) ... I intuitively suppose there is a relationship with a Poisson ... distribution but I don't see where p and n fit in, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: How to determine whether a process is Poisson
    ... I do not have the inter-arrival times information. ... How can I determine whether this arrival process is Poisson or not? ... If the process is a Poisson process, then the distribution of the number of arrivals will be Poisson. ...
    (sci.stat.math)