Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:30:55 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:43:25 -0700 (PDT), Mistress Helios wrote:
On Sep 11, 10:12 pm, Dave Seaman <dsea...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Mistress Helios wrote:
On Sep 11, 5:25 am, Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
v4vijayakumar wrote:
Give an example of a topological space that is both connected and totally
disconnected.
Consider the segment [0,1], and to each point we assign a probabilityI don't know what mathematically that means, but is it possible
something to be both connected and disconnected..?? If it is connected
then it is not disconnected, or, if it is disconnected then there is
no connection. :-)
of 1/2 that the point exists. Consider the points, as stated, and not
the expected length.
Then, there is a nonzero probability that the whole thing is totally
connected, and a nonzero probability that the whole thing is totally
disconnected.
The only problem is that this solution requires existential
indeterminacy - therefore, the solution itself is wholly questionable
as to whether it is even math or not. This is indeterminate, and so
why am I posting in sci.math ? Because it _might_ be math !
It also might be nonsense. Again, that's indeterminate.
I believe that was stated properly - but you should also probably not
listen to what I say. Im sure there is a perfectly logical answer to
the question, as opposed to mine which is indeterminate as to whether
it is logical or not.
Good grief.
You are working much too hard. Forget probabilities and just look at the
definitions. It should be obvious.
Well, if one is doing mathematics proper, then the empty set is a good
candidate.
The empty space works, but there is also a nonempty solution. It's
unique, up to homeomorphism.
I've been trying to train myself to think differently and so the most
obvious answer to me really is spacetime. But I cannot claim that I am
doing math, only that it might be math. Im not designing airplanes or
anything so I have the freedom to think about silly things like that.
If you are looking at anything other than the simple mathematical
definitions of the terms, then you are looking in the wrong place.
When all else fails, start by writing down the definitions.
--
Dave Seaman
Third Circuit ignores precedent in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/29/18489281.php>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Mistress Helios
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- References:
- Mathematics: how to start again
- From: v4vijayakumar
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Mistress Helios
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: v4vijayakumar
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Frederick Williams
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Mistress Helios
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- From: Mistress Helios
- Mathematics: how to start again
- Prev by Date: Re: Again on Lobachevskij
- Next by Date: Re: Error surface question
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematics: how to start again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|