Re: Bye
- From: Balthasar <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:46:46 +0200
Am Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:51:45 -0700 (PDT) schrieb
victor_meldrew_666@xxxxxxxxxxx:
It is. But you may read it as R+.
My main topic is IR+. However you ignored what I am claiming.
You have neither defined IR+ (that's not a standard notation)
IR+ := {x e IR : x > 0}.
See:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/R-Plus.html
Right.
Mathematicians understand IR+ like IR but restricted to positive values.
It is. "IR" (meant as a single symbol) denotes the set of real numbers:
Again, what is IR? That is not standard notation.
See:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RealNumber.html
B.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very basic mistakes
- From: Salviati
- Re: Very basic mistakes
- References:
- Blumschien's very basic mistakes
- From: victor_meldrew_666
- Re: Very basic mistakes
- From: Salviati
- Blumshein's very basic mistakes
- From: victor_meldrew_666
- Re: Very basic mistakes
- From: Salviati
- Breadline schmuck's basic mistakes
- From: victor_meldrew_666
- Bye
- From: Salviati
- Re: Bye
- From: victor_meldrew_666
- Blumschien's very basic mistakes
- Prev by Date: Re: qustion about a set with an operation.
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Pythagorean Triplets and Pell's Equation
- Previous by thread: Breadline schmuck's basic mistakes
- Next by thread: Re: Very basic mistakes
- Index(es):