Re: Complete theory for 2 variable Diophantine equations, paper now available
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 08:33:49 -0400
JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sep 13, 6:18 pm, Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Pray tell, could you post the reviewers' comments when they come back?
They never send them to me. Never.
Guess they realize I'd just post them and rip on them.
Editors have no obligation to send papers to reviewers before
rejecting them. If an editor thinks that it is plainly obvious the
paper does not meet the journal standards, then he'll reject it
himself and no reviewer will see it.
So, with that in mind, there are two possibilities:
(1) You don't get reviewer comments because no reviewer has seen it.
(2) You don't get reviewer comments because editors are scared of
adverse publicity from the Google-Master.
Yeah, probably (2).
--
"And I wish some of you would grow past thinking that you've discovered
some extraordinary thing [...] as if you found the Holy Grail or
something, when I acknowledge a mistake. After all, I've had to do it
quite a few times. It's not like it's news." --James S. Harris
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is one-to-one mapping valid for comparing infinite-sized sets?
- Next by Date: Re: Embedding an elementary abelian group into a symmetric group
- Previous by thread: simlpex source code
- Next by thread: Order modulo p^n (Number Theory)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
