Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 28, 3:37 am, LudovicoVan <ju...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am thinking along the following lines, and I'd greatly appreciate
some feedback.
Given the set of the extended naturals: N* := N u {w}, where
'w' (omega) is the limit ordinal.
Let's consider the infinite binary tree, that is -informally- a binary
tree with w levels.
You seem to mean by this that you have a last level, the one
indexed by w. This is by no means what essentially every one
means by `the infinite binary tree', and in fact this means
pretty much nothing, unless you actually tell us what you
mean by it. `Informally' is really not good enough.
-- m
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- References:
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: I need some help/advice on a probability model I'm working on...
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another disproof of the diagonal argument
- Previous by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Index(es):