Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan <julio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
On 29 Sep, 03:48, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
<mariano.suarezalva...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 28, 3:37 am, LudovicoVan <ju...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am thinking along the following lines, and I'd greatly appreciate
some feedback.
Given the set of the extended naturals: N* := N u {w}, where
'w' (omega) is the limit ordinal.
Let's consider the infinite binary tree, that is -informally- a binary
tree with w levels.
You seem to mean by this that you have a last level, the one
indexed by w.
I can drop the "informally": A tree with w levels! What is the problem
with that?
-LV
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- References:
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Yet another disproof of the diagonal argument
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another disproof of the diagonal argument
- Previous by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|