Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: David R Tribble <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Mariano Suarez-Alvarez
You seem to mean by this that you have a last level, the one
indexed by w.
LudovicoVan wrote:
I can drop the "informally": A tree with w levels! What is the problem
with that?
Nothing at all.
However, you have a huge problem if you are saying there
is a level that has index w.
Just one of the many problems this creates for you:
what is the index of the level immediately before level w?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- References:
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Subgroups of direct products
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another flawed disproof of the diagonal argument
- Previous by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Index(es):