Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:47:11 -0400
In article
<36da9a22-353b-4a59-b222-36c755be8d3f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
David R Tribble <david@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mariano Suarez-Alvarez
You seem to mean by this that you have a last level, the one
indexed by w.
LudovicoVan wrote:
I can drop the "informally": A tree with w levels! What is the problem
with that?
Nothing at all.
However, you have a huge problem if you are saying there
is a level that has index w.
It may make perfectly good sense, depending on your definition of
"tree".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_(set_theory)
Just one of the many problems this creates for you:
what is the index of the level immediately before level w?
Depending on your definition of "tree", it can happen that "level
immediately before" need not be defined.
--
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- References:
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: LudovicoVan
- Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- From: David R Tribble
- Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: -- Wrong limits do not commute
- Next by Date: Re: complex number identity
- Previous by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|