Re: Approaching the infinite binary tree

On 29 Sep, 20:47, "G. A. Edgar" <ed...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
In article
<36da9a22-353b-4a59-b222-36c755be8...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
David R Tribble <da...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mariano Suarez-Alvarez
You seem to mean by this that you have a last level, the one
indexed by w.

LudovicoVan wrote:
I can drop the "informally": A tree with w levels! What is the problem
with that?

Nothing at all.

However, you have a huge problem if you are saying there
is a level that has index w.

It may make perfectly good sense, depending on your definition of
"tree".
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_(set_theory)

Thanks for the pointer, indeed that's it.

-LV
.