Re: CERN concern
- From: Mensanator <mensanator@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 2, 8:22 am, "Dr Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan.R...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:01:26 EDT, conesetter <coneset...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in <12124044.1222938116442.JavaMail.jaka...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
But if CERN can
produce non-decaying micro black holes, thenThis analogy is defective. If I understand it correctly the LHC will
cosmic ray events should produce some too.
bang millions of particles together at once. So comparing it with what a
cosmic ray does is like comparing an atom bomb with a single uranium atom..
Idiot. Any given proton will collide with at most one other
proton. We expect 10-20 collisions each time the beams cross. Each
collision is totally independent of any other collision. There is no
additive effect.
If a single black hole forms, won't it collide with other protons?
And wouldn't that effect be additive since it's a black hole?
--
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
"In theory, the probability that the LHC will produce pink elephants
is not zero." -- Joe Lykken.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CERN concern
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: CERN concern
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: CERN concern
- References:
- Re: CERN concern
- From: conesetter
- Re: CERN concern
- From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: CERN concern
- Prev by Date: Re: Is one-to-one mapping valid for comparing infinite-sized sets?
- Next by Date: Re: > A group of order 15 is cyclic
- Previous by thread: Re: CERN concern
- Next by thread: Re: CERN concern
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading