Re: one of the great relations
- From: galathaea <galathaea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:30:20 EDT
On Oct 3, 2:01 pm, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Oct 2, 9:15 pm, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
can't be forced to be
(excuse the broken capitalisation)
On Oct 2, 5:54 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's interesting to me that it's rational and
drop.integer, which may be why I kind of let things
getting bored with the
I find that kind of disappointing.
I MAY re-visit the issue at some point but I'm
massive number theoreticpaper which is why I've moved on to that
interesting.structure which for the moment is more
of limited interest to
I'm kind of close to dropping it all though as
INTERESTEDme.
Once I get answers to why I tend to wander off.
DON'T FUCKING DO IT
DON'T FUCKING RUN AWAY
OK?
WRITE IT OUT TO THE END
YOU'RE A FUCKING ADULT
ACT LIKE ONE
WRITE IT OUT TO THE END
PROFESSIONALLY
BREAK IT DOWN
1. YOU WANT TO (ANALYSE?) PELL EQUATIONS
A
|
|
FILL THIS PART IN---
EXPAND
A. QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY AND SOLUTION EXISTENCE
B. SOLUTION CHAINS
C. ?
...
2. YOU WANT GENERALISATIONS TO QUADRATIC FORMS
A. QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY AND SOLUTION EXISTENCE
B. SOLUTION CHAINS
...
3. RELATIONS BETWEEN FORMS AND VARIETIES
A. PELL AND PYTHAGOREAN
...
GIVE THE COMPLETE THEORY
NOT BECAUSE I TOLD YOU TO
BUT BECAUSE YOU NEED TO KNOW
YOU NEED TO SEE THAT YOU CAN ACTUALLY
BE ONE TOO
(YOU'RE GETTING OLDER EVERY DAY)
--
YOU'RE RIGHT THERE
IT'S GETTING A BIT HARD
(BECAUSE THERE IS A LOT OF BRUTE FORCE NEEDED)
YOU'RE GETTING TIRED
(WHO THE HELL DOESN'T?)
BUT YOU KNOW YOU'VE FINALLY BEGUN TO UNDERSTAND
WHAT YOU KNOW TO BE AN IMPORTANT CONNECTION
YOU ARE VERY RIGHT TO FEEL THAT
NOW GET IT DONE
EVOLVE YOUR PAPER TO FILL OUT THOSE CONJECTURES
PROVE THEM RIGHT OR DEMONSTRATE COUNTEREXAMPLES
WHATEVER IT TAKES TO (ANALYSE?)
GENERALISE AND FILL IN THE GAPS
YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT YOU CAN DO
DO IT
DON'T TURN AWAY WHEN YOU ARE JUST GETTING
WHOLE
WRITE IT ALL OUT
THE BIG PICTURE HERE
NUMBER IT
SECTION IT
SUBSECTION IT
CLASSIFY WHAT YOU ARE WORKING ON
HERE'S A HINT:
DON'T TRY TO MAKE EVERY LITTLE THING WORK
BUT DO TRY TO ANALYSE WHAT IS STILL HIDING
VAGUE AND UNRESOLVED
AND TRY TO HAVE A SECTION FOR EACH PART OF THE
A CLUMSY AND POOR SECTION CAN BE LOOKED AT
THOUGHT ABOUT AT A LATER DATE
PLAYED AROUND WITH
AT LEAST IT STICKS AROUND AND RECORDS ANY PROGRESS
IF YOU DO THAT
I HAVE NO DOUBT YOU WILL SEE THIS GREAT THEORY
IN IT'S ENTIRETY
THAT YOU FEEL TINGLING AROUND INSIDE
I HAVE NO DOUBT
AT THIS POINT
YOU CAN FINISH A THEORY THROUGH
YOU'RE JAMES FUCKING HARRIS FOR CHRIST'S SAKE
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
You're probably just making fun of me, but I do
wonder if I could go
forward a thousand years and look back: does history
hate me or love me?
I have the answers dear, but I find that the
questions mean more to me.
no
i'm not making fun of you
though i'm probably acting a bit silly
i think you are playing around with the equations
in a way that shows you enjoy it
and are discovering the reciprocity link
this is the start of class field theory
i think you could find a lot of that on your own
if you just wrote out what you've already found
i think you're right there
about to make one of those deep understanding
epiphanies of the big picture
and i think it will make you confront ideals
and some of the higher algebra you've been avoiding
just write out what you have with a bit more structure
enumerate cases
make it explicit
i've got a paper i need to do the same thing with
so you must understand i don't look down on you
we're both in the same boat
i'm not making fun of you
james
it's just
the truth is
a thousand years from now
history will not remember you at all
not yet
i'm just trying to tease you into some more follow through
precisely because your fate in history
has yet to be determined
i'm trying to help
sometimes i just get a bit goofy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
.
- Prev by Date: Re: combinatorial interpretation of generalised berneuler numbers
- Next by Date: Re: CERN concern
- Previous by thread: combinatorial interpretation of generalised berneuler numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting property problem
- Index(es):