Re: Q[t]/<t^2+1> has square roots of -1



In article <p6qle4dkcbv678cqthpno9dqahed1rfm3o@xxxxxxx>,
quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:38:52 -0400, quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:29:18 -0700 (PDT), lite.on.beta@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Please tell me if this is correct reasoning:

Q[t] polynomails with rational coefficients
<t^2 + 1> ideal generated by t^2 + 1


let R:= Q[t]/<t^2 + 1>

Since (t^2+1) - 0 is in <t^2 + 1> (*)

We have t^2 + 1 = 0 in R (**)
t^2 = -1

Thus -1 has square roote -t and t in R.

Is my solution good?

Yes.

Is there a quicker easier way to go from (*) to (**)?

No.

But let me point out that there is a slight abuse of notation when you
use the letter "t" to denote both

the indeterminate of Q[t]

and

the image of that indeterminate in R.

Still, it's a convenient, standard abuse, just so long as you realize
that to be technically correct, you should either use another letter,
for example t-bar, or alternatively, represent the image of t in R by
p(t), say, where p is the natural map from Q[t] to R.

or by t + < t^2 + 1 >,
so it's clear you're talking about the coset containing t.

--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Q[t]/ has square roots of -1
    ... Qpolynomails with rational coefficients ... Thus -1 has square roote -t and t in R. ... But let me point out that there is a slight abuse of notation when you ...
    (sci.math)
  • Q[t]/ has square roots of -1
    ... Please tell me if this is correct reasoning: ... Qpolynomails with rational coefficients ... Thus -1 has square roote -t and t in R. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Q[t]/ has square roots of -1
    ... Qpolynomails with rational coefficients ... Thus -1 has square roote -t and t in R. ... Is there a quicker easier way to go from to? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Q[t]/ has square roots of -1
    ... Qpolynomails with rational coefficients ... Thus -1 has square roote -t and t in R. ...
    (sci.math)