Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bill Dubuque <wgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 07 Oct 2008 18:10:27 -0400
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill Dubuque <wgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think most mathematicians are far more interested in
the beauty of mathematical objects than they are in the
beauty of the physical objects representing them
Which is why they're not in a mad rush to hunt down
every vague thread remotely related to whatever they're
working on. You can't enjoy the beauty of mathematics when
it's whizzing by at 90 megs/sec. The beauty is in the
enjoyment of learning and discovery. You're skipping
that part. Yes, you can get to the top of the mountain
and enjoy the view quickly and easily by gunning your
Harley up the trail. But the view at the top is only
a small part of the hike.
Why do you think that, and how is it related to this thread?
By the way, if you want a glimpse of some "sensual" mathematics,
I highly recommend John Conway's book: The Sensual (Quadratic) Form.
Below is an excerpt from Richard K. Guy's informative review [1].
I am proud that during my service on the Hedrick Lecturers Committee,
we secured the services, along with those of Sir Michael Atiyah and Ron
Graham, of John Horton Conway. The lectures had to be heard, seen, felt,
smelled and tasted in order to appreciate them fully, but now we have the
next best thing, a written (and thankfully expanded) record.
If you know nothing about quadratic forms, or if you are an expert, you
should read this book. There is no shortage of books on quadratic forms
[1,2,3,5,6,7,9,10,12], so something unusual is needed to excuse another.
As we have come to expect, Conway provides us with the unusual. He gives
us new insights, insounds, inscents; he puts us in touch while writing
tastefully. To do justice to it, we would need to copy out the whole book.
I content myself with describing one item, Conway's river, and leave you to
read about conorms and vonorms, Farey fractions and PSL2(Z), isospectral
lattices (why you cannot hear their shape), gluing, the little Methuselah
form, the fifteen theorem, the quadratic form as a bouquet of flowers
- each flower from a finite field, and much more, in this remarkably
informative yet concise little book. [...]
--Bill Dubuque
[1] http://journals.cms.math.ca/cgi-bin/vault/public/view/CRUXv26n3/body/PDF/page147-150.pdf?file=page147-150
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- References:
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- Prev by Date: Re: another partition question
- Next by Date: D is integral domain and D[t] is PID, how to show D is a field
- Previous by thread: Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- Next by thread: Re: Out-of-print math books: An Update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|