Re: a conjecture !

David :

On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:49:28 EDT, amy666
<tommy1729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

David wrote :

On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:05:43 EDT, amy666
<tommy1729@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

i will have to be more clear and specific about
my
questions ...

ill have to make a restatement ...

regards

tommy1729

first a conjecture :

Not really, just nonsense.

a function f(z) is entire apart from potential
removable singularities if

What is a "potential" removable singularity?

1) it converges for all of z

What does it mean for a function to converge at z?

2) it has no poles
3) it has no essential singularities
4) it is Coo

I can't imagine a class of functions for which it
really
makes sense to "assume" all of the previous three
assumptions.

why not ?????

You answer my question first.



5) its first derivate is nowhere oo
6) it is Goo , analogue to Coo where G is
gaussian
curvature
7) the equation f(z) = A has a solution for all A
apart from perhaps a single exception
8) f'(z) has the same 7 properties above
9) G_1 f(z) has the same 8 properties as above



regards

tommy1729

David C. Ullrich

"Understanding Godel isn't about following his
formal
proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was
up
to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the
post-grads."
in sci.logic.)

David C. Ullrich

"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal
proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up
to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)

'potential' as in 'might exist'
.

Relevant Pages