Re: P = NP!
- From: riderofgiraffes <mathforum.org_am@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:52:21 EDT
Yaakov Davis ...
I'm very excited to announce that I've managed to
develop a polynomial time algorithm for solving
the SAT problem, therefore proving P = NP.
Newbie ...
Why you don't use your algorithm to solve some
hard problem? ... convert instances of FACTORING
into istances of SAT.
Various Patent offices around the world now insist
that the inventors of perpetual motion devices and
inertial drive devices produce a demonstration of
their device before even bothering to examine the
application. Claims of polynomial algorithms for
NP problems should demonstrate their algorithms on
known hard instances.
The OP's reluctance to address this point suggests
that their method simply doesn't work. Even an
inefficient implementation will show the correct
growth of solution time with instance size, giving
confidence that there's something in the claim.
Without such a demonstration, the over-whelmingly
large probability is that it just doesn't work.
The OP suggests we try the algorithm for ourselves.
He's the one in line to win the $1m, why doesn't he
do it?
But remember, almost every (in the technical sense)
instance of most NP problems are easy. Use a known
hard instance. Factoring is a good one, even though
it's not NPC.
.
- References:
- Re: P = NP!
- From: newbie
- Re: P = NP!
- Prev by Date: Re: Which axiom prohibits this kind of construction?
- Next by Date: Re: Algebra with extension field, degree.
- Previous by thread: Re: P = NP!
- Next by thread: Re: P = NP!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|