Re: P = NP!
- From: Yaakov Davis <yaakov.davis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:05:02 EDT
Well, you obviously proved that the algorithm doesn't work. I thank you for taking it seriously and providing a proof for your claims.
I thank all of you of participating, as well.
I suspect I had something translated wrong from my original idea to the implementation. Hopefully I'll be able to come back soon with a real solution, in a convincing way.
I'll run some serious tests about it next time before considering it as a real answer, though..
Have a nice time.
.
- References:
- Re: P = NP!
- From: Jan Andres
- Re: P = NP!
- Prev by Date: Re: Which axiom prohibits this kind of construction?
- Next by Date: Re: there are still drives that talk with you
- Previous by thread: Re: P = NP!
- Next by thread: Re: FLT: a short amateur proof for case 2: where is the mistake?
- Index(es):