Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:45:40 +0000 (UTC)
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:38:34 EDT, T.H. Ray wrote:
Dave Seaman wrote
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:27:01 EDT, T.H. Ray wrote:
william elliot wrote
<macromi...@xxxxxxxxx>On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Herman Rubin wrote:
Dave <dave_and_darla@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 10, 8:56=A0pm, BURT
circle.wrote:
circular shape." SoWhat makes something geometrically round?
In the geometrical sense, round means "having a
something is round if and only if it is a
round
No, it is much less. For closed convex sets,
convexmeansHerman Rubin specified closed (i.e., compact) and
that every point is an extreme point.
Every point of the set is an extreme point or
every point of the boundary is an extreme point?
set. His definition is sufficient. That everypoint
lies extreme to a fixed point guaranteescontinuous,
uniform curvature on the boundary.
What does "extreme to a fixed point" mean? I know
what an extreme point
of a convex set is, but by that definition, only the
boundary points of a
disk qualify as extreme points.
A disk is "round," is it not? The definition can
be extended to the underlying disk manifold of higher
dimensional objects.
We agree that a disk is round, but you didn't answer my question. What
does "extreme to a fixed point" mean?
It appears to me that a workable definition is that a compact convex set
is round if all of its boundary points are extreme points, as William
Elliott suggested. According to this definition a disk is round, but a
circle is not. You seemed to take issue with that suggested definition.
I am merely asking for an explanation of your objection.
A circle is ruled
out because it is not
convex.
And a circle is not "round" in any but the colloquial
sense. A closed curve is not necessarily round.
See above. A circle is not round by the proposed definition because it
is not convex. The question remains, why are you convinced that a disk
is round, despite the fact that not all of its points are extreme points?
Or have I misunderstood your claim? It's hard to tell, because you have
not explained what "extreme to a fixed point" means.
Moreover, a convex set having an elliptical
boundary also has
the property that every boundary point is an extreme
point, even though
the curvature is not uniform.
Then maybe "uniformly extreme" is the qualifier.
What does "uniformly extreme" mean?
--
Dave Seaman
Third Circuit ignores precedent in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/29/18489281.php>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- References:
- Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- From: T.H. Ray
- Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- Prev by Date: Re: complex numbers and the law of cosine-
- Next by Date: Re: Mutually exclusive question
- Previous by thread: Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- Next by thread: Re: What is the mathematical definition of round?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading