Re: The First Variation of a PDF
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:50:17 -0700
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, junoexpress wrote:
Consider a pdf having compact support on [-X,+X] for some given
positive real X, that is a function of a real parameter c.
When c=0, the pdf is symmetric about x=0 and the pdf takes a very
simple form.
When c is non-zero, the form of the pdf is non-symmetric about x=0
becomes quite complicated.
I want to understand the effect c has when it is small but non-zero,f(x,c) =~ f(x,0) + c.f_c(x,0).
on the bias of x.
One way I considered was to construct an approximation to the pdf:
(1) f(x,c) \approx f(x,o) + c (df/dc)at c=0
Now the RHS of (1) integrates to 1, but it is probably not a pdf
(since it is not obvious the first order approx is non-negative). This
integral(-oo,oo) f(x,0) dx + integral(-oo,oo) c.f_c(x,c) dx
= 1 + c.integral(-oo,oo) f_c(x,0) dx = 1
bothers me somewhat, and has me wondering if this is the correct wayWhy should it bother you? Doesn't it make you happy to have
to approach this problem. Any suggestions?
an approximate pdf to work with?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The First Variation of a PDF
- From: junoexpress
- Re: The First Variation of a PDF
- References:
- The First Variation of a PDF
- From: junoexpress
- The First Variation of a PDF
- Prev by Date: Re: prove -1/2 is not a subsequential limit of S_n
- Next by Date: Re: Algebra with finite extension field before.
- Previous by thread: The First Variation of a PDF
- Next by thread: Re: The First Variation of a PDF
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|