Re: Notes on irreducibles, reducibles in Integral Domains
- From: Hagen <knaf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:26:11 EDT
And does anyone know of an integral domain without
any primes?
Such domains exist in abundance: take an integral domain R with
the following properties:
1. R has only two prime ideals.
2. R is not a UFD.
3. R is noetherian.
Then R possesses no primes.
Proof: let p be a prime. Then by (1) pR is the maximal ideal of R.
Hence by (3) every non-unit of R can be written as u*p^k for some
unit u of R and natural number k. This contradicts (2).
Are there integral domains with the properties 1-3 ?
Beginner's algebraic geometry tells that the local ring in a
singular point of an algebraic curve has all of these properties.
Some commutative algebra gives the following family of examples:
take some finite extension A of the integers within a number field.
Localize A at a non-zero prime ideal; if the resulting ring R is not
integrally closed within its field of fractions, then it has the
properties 1-3.
In all of these examples none of the irreducibles is prime, but
irreducibles are at least existing. Passing to non-noetherian rings
yields examples without any irreducibles:
let S be the ring of all algebraic integers, that is complex numbers
that are roots of a polynomial x^n+a_(n-1)x^(n-1)+...+a_0
having integer coefficients.
Given a non-unit x os S, a square root y of x is in S too. Hence
x=y^2 and thus no non-unit of S is irreducible.
H
.
- References:
- Re: Notes on irreducibles, reducibles in Integral Domains
- From: lite . on . beta
- Re: Notes on irreducibles, reducibles in Integral Domains
- Prev by Date: Thanks for you help
- Next by Date: Re: Is one-to-one mapping valid for comparing infinite-sized sets?
- Previous by thread: Re: Notes on irreducibles, reducibles in Integral Domains
- Next by thread: Re: Notes on irreducibles, reducibles in Integral Domains
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|