E=mc(squared) = E=mc(circled), and celestial orbits, may indeed be, “Natures Squaring of the Circle”.
- From: cjcountess <cjcountess@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
E=mc(squared) = E=mc(circled), may indeed be, "Natures Squaring of
the Circle".
Hi this is Conrad Countess again, with two more Math Ideas
Upon reading "Lecture delivered before the International Congress of
Mathematicians, Paris France, 1900" by David Hilbert.
Fron:http://www.everythingimportant.org/physics/Hilbert.htm
I found it interesting that in David Hilbert's paper describing the
need to axiomatize physics it was revealed that squaring the circle
has been a mathematical problem for centuries, and that even though
people have come close to it, the transcendental nature of pi prevents
the perfect squaring of the circle.
See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_circle
I could not help but to draw the analogy between the idea that
E=mc(squared) = E=mc(circled) as it may indeed be, "Natures Squaring
of the Circle".
According to this idea, (c^2), is a frequency at high end of EM
spectrum where energy turns to matter, because it takes on a circular
and /or spherical configuration. See : http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_11vv737cck
Long Version: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_102hm2wwrhf
Since this high frequency cut off naturally leads to the unity of the
coupling constants, energy (E), mass(M), length(L), time(T),and
charge(Q), as well as other constants, it also transcends another
mathematical concept of "Dimensional Analysis", which states according
to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional_analysis
Introduction pp7
Only like-dimensioned quantities may be added, subtracted, compared,
or equated. When unlike-dimensioned quantities appear opposite of the
"+" or "-" or "=" sign, that physical equation is not plausible, which
might prompt one to correct errors before proceeding to use it
Introduction pp2
There are no conversion factors between dimensional symbols.
And it only makes sense that the more basic you get, the more unified
these basics will be, and c^2 seems to be the conversion factor that
unifies them all therefore transcending differences in the dimensions
of length, time, mass, and so on on the macro level
But as such indicates that just as E=mc^2 and m=Ec^2 so does T=mc^2,
L=mc^2, Q=mc^2 and so on, as c^2 is that mathematical conversion
frequency where they converge and are unified..
This indicates that at this frequency/wavelength, that can also
represent a quantum of length of space-time, it is the basic measure
of area and/or volume, that could be contained in a circle or a
square. And sense this basic energy of c^2 takes the form of circular
an/or spherical motion, this is natures own way of squaring the
circle.
Also, all circular motion, including planet orbits, can be measured as
(velocity squared) as in formula for acceleration of circular motion
A=v^2/r. And so even if still square area of space cannot be
circularized, moving space energy can.
Conrad Countess
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: help with solving Riccati equation
- Next by Date: Re: Two More New Math Ideas
- Previous by thread: Two More New Math Ideas
- Next by thread: Re: E=mc(squared) = E=mc(circled), and celestial orbits, may indeed be, “Natures Squaring of the Circle”.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
