Re: Gravity can move through itself



RustyJames wrote:
On Oct 30, 12:19 pm, BURT <macromi...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The gravity of the Earth is moving through the gravity of the Sun.
Then there is the 3 body system and more.

Mitch Raemsch

The gravitational influence of every object is exerted through all
space.

Gravity: not just a good idea.

Basically gravity has that each mass attracts each other. Where in magnetism there are field orientations which when opposite attract and alike repel, gravity is constant attraction.

Or is it? Consider an alternative reasoning as to why gravity works, particularly with a notion that if it can be explained in terms of mechanics of simpler or more simple systems, mathematics based on those systems are useful to compute it. (I think spacetime is flat, with the cosmological constant being an infinitesimal yet non-zero.) Gravity happens because nature pushes masses together, they aggregate, or, the masses pull themselves together. Gravity is basically simple, it's about attraction, and repulsion. Yet, gravity's story is that it's about attraction. The mathematics of massy bodies in terns of their gravitional attraction to each is computed to the extent that the unit of mass is the gram. (Mass and weight are different, yet, often gravity is simply presumed a constant.) The geodetic survey of the gravitational constant G of the Earth varies according to the geodesy from some 9.15 to 9.24, even less in some places.

The idea is that gravity explains both attraction and repulsion. Here's a simple thought experiment to find that so. The mathematics of the bodies would be the same whether the gravity was attractive, in the local origin, or repulsive, in space. It is as if the Universe was an infinitely distanced infinitely thin infinitely dense spherical shell surrounding everything that actually repels all matter (mass). It could also be the infinitely distance infinitely thick infinitely dense, with even fluctuations in all parameters. The mathematics for the bodies work out the same, in the models, particularly for the two-body system.

As I discuss in my general culminations of theory, it is a simple case.

It is to all points.

Tensors are affine, no?

Thanks,

Ross Finlayson
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
    ... My understanding of gravity is that it represents the attraction that ... two objects with mass have towards one another. ... the case that energy is attracted to itself too, but at a factor of C2 ... would there be any gravity left? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory
    ... it seems the ep of gravitational mass and inertial mass ... without attraction, and Divergert Matter definitely has centro-symmetry ... >Gravity DOEs NOT EXiST, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: how does atom knows that it is pushed in order to oppose resistance?
    ... attraction would be replaced by a repulsion. ... my AGV(anti gravity vehicle) to fly, no matter how I phase the ... Induced Dipole interaction stores charges in between electrode. ... law of inertia is unsatisfactory ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Attraction VS geometry
    ... is harmful to advances in the understanding of gravity. ... >aspect of geometry, not some mysterious "attraction". ... near the earth, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
    ... > Is There a Force of Gravity? ... > Earth's gravitational acceleration and consider the Earth to be a closed ... gravitational attraction and inertial acceleration. ... It is only in the never-never world which mathematics allows one to ...
    (sci.physics.particle)