Re: Arrange them
- From: Nimo <azeez541@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:22:08 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 20, 10:47 am, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 19, 2:30 pm, Nimo <azeez...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 20, 3:19 am, Ray Vickson <RGVick...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 19, 1:57 pm, Nimo <azeez...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK can you tell me how to 'state' the problem
" so that I would write it ", as you said.
you just give me some points, I'll state the Question
touching those points.
so that everyone can understand it.
Thanks.
Please clarify. Do you just have MW MW MW W, or do you have John(M)Mary
(W) Fred(M)Susan(W) Sidney(M)Zelda(W) Rosanne(W). In the first case
you cannot tell one M from another, so there is just one
'arrangement', while in the other the different Ms and Ws have
different names, so there are many inequivalent arrangements. Even if
you mean the second, I still do not see what your stated problem IS.
Did you have an unordered list of 7 people (3M, 4W) and wanted to put
them in a particular order using the fewest steps (whatever a 'step'
may be), or what?
Your problem seems to be one of communication. You seem to write down
statements without really thinking them through. If English is not
your first language, you should think about the problem's statement in
your first language, giving the message a logical structure (imagine
that you want to explain the problem to your little sister). After you
have done that, then translate the message into English.
R.G. Vickson
OK, let MAN as 'Apple' and WOMAN as 'Mango'
A M M M M A A
you arrange them in pairs like AM AM etc.
then, I'll continue the next step
i think there has also been a problem
with others expressing why you don't make sense
so let me show you how i read your problem
and why it doesn't make sense to me
let's say we have 10 men and 5 women (1)[yes you are right]
you want an algorithm to write them in pairs
that is _extremely_ simple
just take the lesser of the two numbers
(5 here is less than 10)
and write that many pairs
WM WM WM WM WM
now subtract the smaller number from the larger
10 - 5 = 5
and write that many individuals of the larger type
M M M M M (2)[up to here, it's OK]
done
is that really what you wanted?
it doesn't make sense
because it doesn't use any of the other words
that you've used in your description
it doesn't use any starting position(3)[what position you are asking]
(it just uses the number of each type)
even if you were given a starting position
there is no reason to use it for anything
it doesn't have anything to do with reversible (4) [y not reversible]
in fact
it can't be reversible
because none of any starting information
is stored in the final position (5) [its confusing here]
do you see why it might be frustrating to answer?
it's possible you have a very clear problem here
and you just don't know what else needs to be said (6)[a part is right,about that]
is this a problem you want to program on a computer?(7)[may be, first I need the Idea , algorithm]
maybe you are looking to do this for a data structure?
like a string?
do these people have names? (8)[no think like this AABABABBBABAA]
does the starting position obey some kind of rule?(9) [no, they are provided as random ]
or is it just an arbitrary one
chosen from any of the possible arrangements?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
.
- References:
- arranging men, women problem
- From: Nimo
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Nimo
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Nimo
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Nimo
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Ray Vickson
- Re: Arrange them
- From: Nimo
- Re: Arrange them
- From: galathaea
- arranging men, women problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Factoring question
- Next by Date: Re: Factoring question
- Previous by thread: Re: Arrange them
- Next by thread: Re: Arrange them
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|