Re: connected
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:13:38 -0800
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, kupier wrote:
Yes .thanks for your correction.As I compose off line, I can reply to what's included
but what is the proof?
how can prove it?
any solution ?
in the reply itself and not to what's not included.
Please included essential content _within_ your reply
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm
BTW, sentences begin with a capital letter.
.
- References:
- connected
- From: kupier
- Re: connected
- From: kupier
- connected
- Prev by Date: Re: For TdL and 2k+3=p (prime number)
- Next by Date: Conjecture:2^p-1 isn't prime
- Previous by thread: Re: connected
- Next by thread: Re: connected
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|