Simple but revolutionary math question
- From: gabydewilde <gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:47:04 -0800 (PST)
Hello all,
I've saved the world again. Obviously no one is interested in what I
have to say. I hope you can suspend thinking that saving the world is
stupid for just one discussion. Solutions really exist, disbelieves
are not proof.
So, I would like for you to confirm my simple math. I need
professional help. The idea is in desperate need of some good
formula's to further convince civilisation of it's merit. I'm not
looking to get rich, in fact, technically my invention is now public
domain.
Please bear with me ok?
First a few points:
1 - heavier than air flying machines can really fly.
2 - Sailboats can sail close to the wind.
3 - Windmills have only a few blades to prevent the wind from flowing
around it.
4 - Wind energy grows at the cube of the speed.
5 - Vehicle drag grows at the cube of the speed.
So this means we have 20 mph combined drag moving at 10 mph up against
10 mph wind.
If you understand point (2) you know the boat may sail up the wind. If
you understand point (3) you should be able to understand the blades
are not moving backwards but they are moving sidewards.
Sticking a windmill onto a car does not cause the blades to move
backwards. Not moving backwards means the sailboat like blades can
"sail" up the drag.
The blades are not moving in the same direction as the vehicle but
they are moving sidewards. I have more elaborate visual documentation
but I put together this silly picture to keep this posting short and
to the point.
http://wind-car.go-here.nl/sci-math-wind-car-nl.jpg
Please laugh at it first, then do the math and see the problems of
windmills (3) are not there, of course the first thing that pops to
mind is the drag but the drag is not there per point (4)
The concept is very old in lots of different applications. The only
thing that is missing is good math. All I ask is for you to suspend
your obvious disbelieves to the point you have some real numbers
disproving the technology. We can use wind energy at zero mph, the
idea it would be worse at 60 mph is fairly silly.
I'm well aware how hard it is to link cause to effect. I don't want to
act dramatically but you know we are being monetised by energy
monopolists you know we are killing the eco system and you know what
this invention would mean to the world. It will put the power back
with the people. I'm not some nihilist looking for compliments. If you
so desire I will reference your calculations in free plans.
Thanks for your time effort and calculations.
P.S.
Please do ignore the shills who inevitably show up in response to this
kind of topics.
______
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt3smrXkVpE
.
- Prev by Date: Re: How to win on Roulette
- Next by Date: Re: Is max(x,y) f separable?
- Previous by thread: Can we infer the summation of the principle eigenvector's entries?
- Next by thread: failure functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|