Re: simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- From: maths@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Sci.math is not a web forum, even if you are reading
and posting through a web interface.
Sci.math is a Usenet forum propagated through nntp protocol.
"Bump" and its brethren are not conventions
in sci.math nor in Usenet in general.
Who got out of bed on the wrong side today? Michael Press thats who!
I know they aren't "conventions". Just because the word didnt
originate here doesn't mean I cant use it. As time goes by words come
and go.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet>
<http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/what-is/part1/>
Google provides access to many forums.
Some of them are web forums fabricated by Google.
Some of them, such as sci.math, are independent of
and predate Google.
yeah I know. Ive been using usenet well before google. Anyway about
that game theory question...
*bump*
.
- References:
- simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- From: maths
- Re: simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- From: maths
- Re: simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- From: maths
- Re: simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- From: Michael Press
- simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- Prev by Date: boolean algebra
- Next by Date: Re: What is this angle ?
- Previous by thread: Re: simple question about subgame perfect nash equilibriums - game theory
- Next by thread: Strange function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|