Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: Robert Israel <israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:05:57 -0600
David C. Ullrich <dullrich@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
A few days ago I decided there was no point, considering the audience,
in pointing out that the existence of a T with L = T^2 is clearly
impossible if we interpret things very strictly. We have
L: X -> Y where X and Y are very different spaces of functions.
If T were a functional square root of L then we'd need to have
somehow T:X -> Z and also T:Z -> Y; if we take T to have
a well-defined domain and co-domain then it follows that
X = Y. Of course this doesn't quite rule out the existence
of some kernel that does the job at least formally.
On the other hand there are spaces X such that L: X -> X.
For example, let X be the space of continuous functions f on (0,infty)
such that x^(1/2) f(x) is bounded.
--
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: amy666
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- References:
- Fractional Transforms
- From: amy666
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: rancid moth
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Fractional Transforms
- Prev by Date: Re: nonsense
- Next by Date: Re: Help with Gamma function
- Previous by thread: Re: Fractional Transforms
- Next by thread: Re: Fractional Transforms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading