Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: lwalke3@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:49:09 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 15, 9:20 pm, "rancid moth" <rancidm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"David C. Ullrich" <dullr...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:amgdk4h906qlra8m60tgiqisbn5nkgs7ka@xxxxxxxxxx
(Readers who are wondering why this X has that property[cut]
should contemplate the Laplace transform of 1/t^(1/2)...)
Yes. i was wondering about that.
Also - what do you mean "..there was no point, considering the audience...."
I know i'm a little wayward with my mathematics, but generally i'm ok and
get there in the end...or at least i thought i was ok.
At the very least i thought i was polite enough to post and get responses..
perhaps not.
Well, the OP, and therefore the prime member of the
audience is tommy1729, who's known for starting
many threads about fractional iteration without
regards to whether fractional iteration is possible.
Thus Ullrich and tommy1729 have been arguing a lot
recently, in many different threads.
.
- References:
- Fractional Transforms
- From: amy666
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: rancid moth
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Fractional Transforms
- From: rancid moth
- Fractional Transforms
- Prev by Date: Re: crank crank crank
- Next by Date: Loan - Extra payment benefit formula
- Previous by thread: Re: Fractional Transforms
- Next by thread: Re: Fractional Transforms
- Index(es):