Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: galathaea <galathaea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:41:50 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 17, 1:23 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 17, 1:00 pm, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 17, 12:41 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please state EXACTLY what you think is incorrect in Jesse's
demonstration and also with my own demonstration that tommy1729's (or
whatever his name was then) theory at that time is inconsistent.
it started with his first step
that [x] might be defined as
forAll(x) forAll(y) (y in [x] <-> y = x)
which is already basically assuming what he wanted to show
(that his derivation would arrive at contradiction)
If that is not tommy1729's definition, then tommy1729 is welcome to
say exactly what his definition is. Moreover, later, tommy1729 himself
said virtually tantamount to the definition you just wrote.
And in my own remarks, as I recall, I stated that unless tommy1729
states a definition, I can only surmise what it is or might be. Later,
as I recall, tommy1729 did affirm (in whatever his own words) that
with x = [x] we get x in x. And in any case, if you go back to my
actual remarks, you will see how I specifically showed that his theory
is inconsistent, based specifically on what tommy1729 wrote as the
description of his theory.
yay!
moeblee thinks:
if x in [x]
then all y in [x] must equal x!
for someone constantly worrying
about people putting words in their mouth
you sure do spew a lot of crap out of there on your own
and you also seem to do the same thing
(put words in peoples mouths)
to those you attack
particularly those you attack as pathetic
you're doing excellent moeblee...
better than expected...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- References:
- insults
- From: salsaonline
- Re: insults
- From: galathaea
- Re: insults
- From: Bill
- Re: insults
- From: galathaea
- Re: insults
- From: Tonicopm
- Re: insults
- From: galathaea
- Re: insults
- From: Tonicopm
- nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: galathaea
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: galathaea
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: galathaea
- Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- From: MoeBlee
- insults
- Prev by Date: Re: Field with one element
- Next by Date: Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- Previous by thread: Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- Next by thread: Re: nothing anyone would want to read (or: crank boxing (or: the death of the dance))
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading