Re: insults
- From: spudnik <Space998@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:28:33 -0800 (PST)
not; like, tautoligies aren't taut enough (see the tautochrone). as I
heard,
it was Godel's proof that pushed him into a breakdown, but that could
be a miscomprehension from the general area of Russell-bashing (see:
http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf -- "Lord Berty the Peace Activist
for Dummies" .-)
I wonder how Russell coped when Wittgenstein convinced him it was
thus quoth anonymous:
Americans need to come to the conclusion quickly that their currency,
although earmarked by a debt which categorically identifies The Dollar
as having an intrinsic relationship to the previously recognized gold
standard, is nothing more than an abstract representation of an
entities available propensity to exchange and furthermore that the
foresaid abstraction of value is not rationally guaranteed by the
terms of any obligation or by any individual, entity or organization,
either political or otherwise which resides or conducts affairs
outside of the borders legitimized by the constitution and military
forces of The United States of America. http://wlym.com/campaigner/7512.pdf
(sik)
.
- References:
- Re: insults
- From: Tonicopm
- Re: insults
- From: galathaea
- Re: insults
- From: Tonicopm
- Re: insults
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: insults
- From: Michael Press
- Re: insults
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: insults
- From: Tonicopm
- Re: insults
- From: Angus Rodgers
- Re: insults
- Prev by Date: Tetration via Newton series -- "finite difference method"
- Next by Date: Re: Differentiation Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: insults
- Next by thread: Re: insults
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|