Re: Alien math

there are no phenomena requiring FLT/travel-in-time,
than Hard SF novels; see Heinlein's very last book!

these "other people" or creatures will just have to communicate,
using physics that are known to us. unfortunately,
these folks like Ed Mithcell, a 33rd degree Freemason supposedly,
as told by one of the Face and Genitals on Mars gorupoid,
have a difficult deal of simply recalling,
what occured during their landings. obviously,
this is because it was such an all-out weird/high experience,
although certainly akin to swimming in a drysuit,
without the hydraulics ... but these Moon Architecture folks,
think it was because they were debriefed/hypnotized/whatever.

now, they also partake of a simple theory,
that we, oiurselves have been "out there" in the far past, and
possibly in the recent past, with a side-trip
to Roswell, which is really just an airf0rce base "with some cache
from WW2" -- *that* is the real "cover-up," more
in the way of simple denial.

however, there really apparently was quite a bit
of occult goings-on around Apollo, which seemed to have
to do with the accident on Apollo One;
they have this written-up.

I do no deny that there really could be a glass dome
on Moon -- if you can really see that in their photos,
which I cannot -- but I argue that
they could very easily be natural bubbles of magma.

and so forth. like the 911truth folks,
they do find interesting anomalies, that invite explanatioj;
they just never really try to, unless
it involves Trickier Dick Cheeny!

thus:
Keizer weems to have reputable publications in the literature, but
I see viturally nothing on your webblog. it is certainly news to me,
that Dirac was a reductionist, or that he "solved the periodical table
with his mechanics," wrongly or not; how
do *you* account for the allegedly missing antimatter?

there is nothing wrong with the theory of strings,
in spite of the recent booklength diatribes
from PI dans Quebec equalment trois,
that is not already a connundrum
in Kaluza-Klein theory in 5D -- and,
that was due solely to Klein's interpretation of "the math." as
for any "time paradox," it only exists in "hard SF" and
the nonsequiter of "travel in time;"
travel *requires* time, or it's just dreamtime.

make-up your own sort of five-dimensional (or "4+1 D.") spaces, and
*then* bitch about canonicals.

The new approach is free of the so-called «time paradox», modeling Nature
--http://www.canonicalscience.org/

thus:
Darfur, which is about 100 per cent Muslim, and
is on the encroahing end of the Sahara, called Sahel
-- see my sigfile!
in places where nationalism isnt popular

thus:
yeah, or a "hyperpoint," or a hypoplane?
is a line segment the closed convex hull of a finite set in R?

thus:
you should study the brachistochrone of Liebniz, Bornoulli,
Huygens, Fermat et al, because it is all downhill from
"Forsooth, I have got a formula." just because I reply, does not mean
that I believe that you are in any way serious or sincere. if you
insist,
the Copenhagenschool parody of Schroedinger's Headgasket is not the
sine
qua non plus ultra of "existential predeterminacy," mod Heisenberg's,
may be I'll just laugh & quit this thread.

I am not the least practiced in Liebniz' calculus, but
I can still not pretend that you are, either,
based upon your limpwristed premonition
of fuzzy logic. now, if the "space deforms according
the existential function, f, or the integral, F,"
you would still have to do some math and
establish this mysterious operator.

all mathematical objects are ideals;
one reifies the math at one's own peril -- or
the general laughter of the Peanut Gallery.

It would be very easy to calculate relativistic corrections using
existential indeterminacy. It is an almost elementary exercise, as is
the precession of planetary perihelions. These things become very easy
to calculate.

--only 24 hours to impeach Trickier Dick from the N.Admin,
metaphorically typing, or Cheeny & Zbiggy, fo'mo' years;
Good Morning, Afghanistan!
.... Good Afternoon, Sudan!
http://tarpley.net/bush12.htm
http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf -- Brits hate Shakes, Why?
http://www.wlym.com/~seattle/dynamis/
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/current.html
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/plates.html
http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/46/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3163
http://wlym.com/campaigner/8011.pdf
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: flyfishing travel agents
    ... Where did you go using these folks? ... Their BC destinations are intriquing. ... their trips are a bit pricey for my taste...but, ... same lodges, etc.) at a better price, but for those who like travel ...
    (rec.outdoors.fishing.fly)
  • Re: NY-Niagara falls
    ... We're going to the Grand Canyon this coming November. ... My wife and I are love to travel, ... natural phenomena. ... folks like art museums, ...
    (rec.travel.usa-canada)
  • Re: Srinivasan ramanujam
    ... -- see my sigfile! ... yeah, or a "hyperpoint," or a hypoplane? ... you should study the brachistochrone of Liebniz, Bornoulli, ... one reifies the math at one's own peril -- or ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Einsteins energy formula E=mc^2 is WRONG!
    ... That's NO math, ... light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires ... The Uncle Stooopid doctrine: ... Rabbi Albert Einstein in 1895 failed an examination that would ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Re: Gas vs Diesel
    ... who has been doing the math on what it REALLY costs to RV. ... that living in Paradise makes travel less appealing, ... morning grateful that we found this place. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)