[ OT ] history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 11:49:20 -0500
I'm interested in compiling a list of cases in the history
of science where the mainstream view was in error in a period
when the mainstream was challenged, where mainstream means
natural philosophers, physicists, biologists, etc.
For example, in an other thread, I mentioned that physicists
gave a low maximum age to the sun before radio-activity
and nuclear reactions were discovered, which was
in quite sharp disagreement with estimates from earth scientists
for time needed to form of the Grand Canyon
[ this may or may not have been a point of disagreement, because
it depends on what geologists theorized or knew about its
formation ] , and a large amount of fossil evidence,
volcanoes, mountain formation and erosion, sedimentation,
and all else that geologists study ].
Another case: in biology, Lamarck had a theory of
spontaneous generation of life:
so mold could form in a closed jar without any "seed"
form of life, in this theory. Same for colonies
of bacteria. Pasteur proved it false, if I've got
the story right.
David Bernier
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- From: Dave L. Renfro
- Re: [ OT ] history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- From: Michael Press
- Re: [ OT ] history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- From: Seymour J.
- Re: history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- From: luiroto
- Re: history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- Prev by Date: Re: Solve Equation for integer value
- Next by Date: Re: E=MC**2 expressed as Venn Diagram (See Attached Graphic)
- Previous by thread: I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!
- Next by thread: Re: history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading